Violent video games should be banned because they lead to violent teens
Debate Rounds (2)
1.) There is no direct evidence of violent video games leading to antisocial behavior, like using guns
A ten million dollar research project requested by president Obama showed no hard evidence that violent video games lead to antisocial behavior like using guns
2) Playing what type of video games we want is a common right that people use DAILY that the proposition is saying does harm
Wouldn"t we then have to ban all other things that some do daily that supposedly cause harm. (We"re not saying it does, but say it does harm.)Wouldn"t we have to ban:
Smoking; kills 443,600 per year, according to livestrong.com
Dinner over 650 calories; livestrong.com says you should have 450- 625; at least 30,000 people die of obesity every year
Showers over 25 minutes; wasting water is a huge problem
All social networking sites; according to bullyingstatistics.com, over half of teens have been affected by cyberbullying.
This is just naming a few... think of all the regulations we could have! 10? 20? 50? The gov. is basically saying if they pass this law that they can pass laws that infringe on everyday activities.
3) In a 2007 study, it was proven that violent video games helped kids to get their anger out. This helps kids express their angry thoughts in a game.
4) The video game industry is a huge industry. Call Of Duty sold more copies in its first day out than any film that year. If we bank them, people will lose jobs and money. Our economy would suffer a huge blow
Cashjlydia forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.