The Instigator
PolitcsMaster
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
JKL
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

WHY the EFF are jorts STILL legal???

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/5/2015 Category: Fashion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 685 times Debate No: 69516
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

PolitcsMaster

Pro

Soccor dad? No. Chicken dad? No.

AGRNY MOOOOOOOOOOOOP!

Also why are the legal
JKL

Con

Jorts the mumbo! Why the are
Debate Round No. 1
PolitcsMaster

Pro

JKL is an A-S-S. I saw your debates and I WANTS THE REBATES!

Mumbo the wumo BUMbo!
JKL

Con

I'm definitely pro gay marijuana cool man numbs out
Debate Round No. 2
PolitcsMaster

Pro

Placebo AMEOBO! I rap while I slap a clapping dappidy dap!
JKL

Con

FunGun nun pin
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by PolitcsMaster 2 years ago
PolitcsMaster
That was fun
Posted by TBR 2 years ago
TBR
Such a clever fellow.

http://www.debate.org...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by BLAHthedebator 2 years ago
BLAHthedebator
PolitcsMasterJKLTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Do I really need to explain?
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
PolitcsMasterJKLTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Non-debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
PolitcsMasterJKLTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Cant decide which side is the bigger retard.