Debate Rounds (5)
Ukraine and Russia are hardly representative to a world war scenario. If I was to take your argument, that means I'd have to regard every conflict in history, from the Chechnya rebels to the Romans as world wars. It would then degenerate into world war 9 million of which makes absolutely no sense.
Thus, that argument is unsound.
Thanks for having Q & A with the president, anyone got questions?
"But what about the Middle East and Syria?"
Syria isn't a war...uhhh(impersonating obama) ....uhhh it's just a...civil war that happen to be under the... uhhh... international spotlight.
=I was just playing around with Q and A haha, I hope you don't mind lol.=
I wouldn't classify terorrism as a world war, as it basically revolves around guerilla warfare. World war involves huge scale battles, the one in the middle east is just small scale harassment day by day.
"But what if there was an occurrence?"
The reasons are already highlighted in our previous rounds. How does a guerilla war translate into a world war?. It is both ideologically and realistically not possible.
My Contention "Conflicts won't revolve into a world war" remains strong.
"Many conflicts have turned into war."
This just a sweeping generalisation. No examples, No historical evidence, No causal correlation whatsoever. This argument barely holds any contesting points, at best it currently sits at 0 on the relevant scale.
My opponent have failed to uphold her Burden of proof that is to proof that WW3 is happening.
Instead she came up with Q & A which is surprisingly enjoyable, lol.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.