The Instigator

Pro (for)

soldieroffortune

Losing

0 Points

The Contender

Con (against)

MarquisX

Winning

12 Points

Walmart or fedex should run our government

Add to My FavoritesReport this DebateShare with My Friends

Do you like this debate?No Yes+0

Vote Here

		Pro	Tied	Con
	Who did you agree with before the debate?
	Who did you agree with after the debate?
	Who had better conduct?
	Who had better spelling and grammar?
	Who made more convincing arguments?
	Who used the most reliable sources?

Reasons for your voting decision - Required

1,000 Characters Remaining

The voting period for this debate does not end.

Voting Style:	Open	Point System:	7 Point
Started:	5/23/2011	Category:	Economics
Updated:	7 years ago	Status:	Voting Period
Viewed:	1,577 times	Debate No:	16640

Debate Rounds (3)

Comments (2)

Votes (2)

Pro The government is very inefficient. If the money is not spent by the next fiscal year end the unit "if let's say the military" will get less money next year so they just spend it all so they are rewarded for waste. I am experienced in how some parts of government run. This is why I don't understand why government does not seem to want to become more efficient. Companies are run to create a profit so they cut out the cancerous inefficient parts and reward productivity why can't we create a productive government. This is just a thought don't you wonder why there are more cops out giving tickets when the city is losing money jails and tickets are revenue so lock up more people make more money? Report this Argument Con I accept this debate challenge. To answer some of your points, running a successful Corporation is very different from running a country. It's not even in the same ballpark. The main thing you have to worry about in running a company is finances and PR(public relations), whereas in a country like America you have to worry about Finances, PR, international affairs, Health Care, I could go on and on. Also no, throwing more people in jail WILL NOT fix out financial problems Looking forward to your arguments. Thank you. Report this Argument
Pro I dont know if you know this but walmart also has public affairs, international affairs, health care and other issues just the same as running a country. oh my last statement about locking people up was not about what we should do its about what is already being done. Report this Argument Con Walmart has a little over 2 million employees. 1.6 of them are suing Walmart AS WE SPEAK. You ask that we put these people in charge of our government? And this is just a run of the mill class-action lawsuit! Oh no sir!* This is the biggest lawsuit in the history of the U.S. It is estimated that the suit could cost WalMart billions. And you sit there and INSIST** that we put these people, this corporation in charge?! And with No evidence or reasons as why? No arguments. If WalMart were to run the government, they would also run the courts. SO tell me, my good sir, how then would these 1.6 million women GET THE JUSTICE THEY DESERVE?! You have no answer.....for there is no answer. You have yet to present to me a single solid argument towards your point and also a single shred of evidence, that you have any idea of what you're talking about. I await your reply. Good night and GOOD LUCK http://www.quora.com... *http://www.katv.com... Report this Argument
Pro soldieroffortune forfeited this round. Con My opponent has forfeited. Vote Con. Report this Argument

Post a Comment

2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.

Posted by i8JoMomma 7 years ago

charles manson should run this country

Report this Comment

Posted by tvellalott 7 years ago

http://www.mises.org...

Report this Comment

2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.

Report this Vote

Vote Placed by quarterexchange 7 years ago

	soldieroffortune	MarquisX	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-		-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-		-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-		-	1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-		1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-		-	2 points
Total points awarded:	0	6

Reasons for voting decision: Gee this was close

Report this Vote

Vote Placed by feverish 7 years ago

	soldieroffortune	MarquisX	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-		-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-		-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-		-	1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-		1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-		-	2 points
Total points awarded:	0	6

Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and didn't argue his extraordinary concept of corporate governance at all well.

Big Issues

Walmart or fedex should run our government