The Instigator
bananman
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
Darong
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

Walrus are cute or not?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Darong
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/30/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 657 times Debate No: 33123
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

bananman

Pro

Walrus is the cutest animal with its cute baby face. I love them all. they're all my babies. I know they love me to. One day we will all be friends and fly over rainbows :3 I love dem!
Darong

Con

Since you didn't define what exact definition of cute you are using, I will propose the definition I find most suitable.

We will be using the second definition on this site: http://www.macmillandictionary.com...

I assume first round is for acceptance, so good luck and let's have a nice fun debate!
Debate Round No. 1
bananman

Pro

Okay then. Very suiting definiton.

I think that the Walrus is a very cute because they are innocent and they are so adorable with their tusks and everything about them. They are such a cute animal.
Darong

Con

Okay, first off Walruses are anything but innocent. Walruses use their tusks to attack and kill other animals. "Walruses feed on clams and other shellfish which they rake from the sandy ocean floor with their long tusks." http://mindjourney1962.wordpress.com...

Walruses even attack other, bigger animals with them! "The tusks also make good weapons against polar bears enemies of the walrus," Another quote from the website mentioned above.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now, being the definition of cute that we are using, I doubt these Walruses can be "cute". Now, we are homo sapiens, Walruses are odobenus rosmarus. Due to our two species being different, we can not possibly reproduce together. This is related because being sexually attracted to something means wanting to reproduce with said organism. Since we can't reproduce with a Walrus, we can not possibly think they are cute, aka sexually attractive.
Debate Round No. 2
bananman

Pro

bananman forfeited this round.
Darong

Con

My opponent forfeited the round so I won't post anything new.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Darong 4 years ago
Darong
@eliza14

You said "i dont agree or disagree", but than you state that "but the against dude i dont agree with".

You said you don't agree or disagree, but than go and disagree with me. How exactly does that work?
Posted by eliza14 4 years ago
eliza14
i dont agree or disagree but the against dude i dont agree with u walruses are beutiful creatures there is cuter but they are cute and ur saying there not hoow could you
Posted by ElmoRepublic 4 years ago
ElmoRepublic
I Vote For Bananaman His Points Are Valid And Truthful!!!
Posted by Walrus101 4 years ago
Walrus101
I don't like where this is going.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by GeekiTheGreat 4 years ago
GeekiTheGreat
bananmanDarongTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and didn't even address the definition.
Vote Placed by Walrus101 4 years ago
Walrus101
bananmanDarongTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to address the definition given by con, and also forfeited, rendering con the winner.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 4 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
bananmanDarongTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con because Pro didn't seem to address Con's definition. Arguments go to Con because for forfeiture. Con gets sources because they actually had sources. One point to pro due to Con's semantics.