The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Warning !....

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/5/2011 Category: Society
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 868 times Debate No: 14282
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




....oncoming vehicles about stationary mobile accident prevention units, (speed cameras) should not be against the law.

Today I was listening to a live (UK) radio phone-in show (BBC Radio 2) debating about the successful conviction of a motorist after being caught flashing oncoming drivers which was adjudged as an attempt to warn them of a stationary mobile speed camera.

He was charged and convicted of obstructing a certain WPC whilst on the course of her duties.
Various analogies were put forward by listeners in support of and against the action, but due to time restraints of the show nothing was settled, so let's try and settle it now.

My position as Pro is pretty straight forward, I will debate the practice of flashing oncoming drivers when they are heading towards a stationary Mobile speed camera should not be against the law, thus not merit a conviction.

From the outset (Round one) Con will debate the action does merit a conviction.

As this debate is based purely on personal opinion, no party shall carry a burden of proof.

Thank you in advance to my opponent for their participation.


I believe that photo-radar cameras used to take pictures of drivers as a way of lay enforcement should be illegal.

As a citizen of Arizona, our state recently tried to use these cameras set up in various areas to try to catch speeders. For about two years we had these cameras up and as of this last year they were taken down. I will explain why.

They are ineffective! What happens when they set up these cameras is that people know where they are. They may be speeding, but if they know a camera is coming up they will slow down just for the camera and then speed back up. Sure, it may catch people every now and then, but then what? What happens once they take your picture of you speeding and your drivers license? Well, they send you a letter. That's it. Many people I know have disregarded these letters and gotten away just okay. But say on the slim chance an officer of the law delivers this letter to you, how does he prove it was you driving the vehicle? He can't! I let friends or family borrow my car all the time. It would be absurd to punish someone if they were not the one driving. I propose that these cameras be illegal because of their ineffectiveness.
Debate Round No. 1


As much as I may or may not agree with my opponent's first round contribution it is not related to this particular debate and therefore off topic

The debate on offer is in relation to the legality of flashing oncoming vehicles to warn them of Mobile speed cameras, (As clearly stated in my opening round) - not the legality and the effectiveness of " photo-radar cameras", which are totally separate issues.

In view of my opponent ignoring his debate requirements for the first round, - " From the outset (Round one) Con will debate the action does merit a conviction". I have no choice but to end this debate, and consider offering it again at a later date.


Flashing motorist can have harmful effects of drivers. They could be temporarily blinded causing an accident. And epileptic people many have problems with this as well. I would like to see tests disproving these statements otherwise it should be illegal. I stand by my statement. Cameras flashing cars should be against the law.
Debate Round No. 2


thisoneguy forfeited this round.


Ahthatsthestuff has not forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Koopin 6 years ago
Dance magic dance!
No votes have been placed for this debate.