The Instigator
choyboy
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points
The Contender
Aerogant
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Was Lee Harvey Oswald a lone gunman

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
choyboy
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/16/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 432 times Debate No: 60546
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

choyboy

Pro

The Warren Commission concluded that "three shots were fired [from the Texas School Book Depository] in a time period ranging from approximately 4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds." Oswald could have never fired 3 accurate shots with a bolt action Mannlicher-Carcano, because while in the Marine Corps, Oswald was classified as a marksman; the lowest rating at the time. Also, according to witnesses,the grassy knoll was the area from where shots were fired, not the Depositary. Many witnesses whose statements pointed to a conspiracy were either ignored or intimidated by the Warren Commission, and many witnesses suffered convenient deaths following the assassination.
The Warren Commission's hypothesis was that: one bullet hit a bystander;
one bullet caused President Kennedy"s fatal head wound;
and one bullet caused all of Kennedy"s and Connally"s non"fatal wounds by entering Kennedy"s back, exiting through his throat, entering Connally"s back, exiting his chest, passing through his right wrist, and lodging itself in his left thigh: developing the single"bullet theory; which defied all known bullet mechanics. Thus, only multiple gunmen could have created the wounds.
Aerogant

Con

Let me explain to you what really happened.

KFC was an idea that would be hatched soon, as they put it themselves out of a compliment to their work with chicken. But their name was too close to JFK, so they felt threatened by it. They went to their food basement, and spent a few years designing a way to combine bullets with fried chicken. Finally, one of them thought of an idea (what if we could figure out how to design a bullet that would pass through a person's body system as food would, allowing it to enter places it normally could not have, then when the food covering the bullet dissolves the human body rejects the foreign object. By achieving this novel experiment, the bullet will enter JFK's back (to symbolize that chicken's got back, not just breasts), so the breaded bullet is then trapped in the esophagus, after the bread dissolved the stomach saw it had a foreign object so it rejected the bullet back up, but because the person that created the bullet was a mad scientist they made sure that upon dissolving there would be a chain reaction that would launch the bullet back to its regular speed, if not more, to pierce his throat like they cut the chicken's throat, then causing collateral damage to unintended victims.

The only reason why they never could find the second bullet is because it was KFC on the same exact day wanting to assassinate JFK all because of the competition between them.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
choyboyAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con trolled.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
choyboyAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: KFC irrelevant.
Vote Placed by AlternativeDavid 2 years ago
AlternativeDavid
choyboyAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: I was very tempted to give Con the points for argument as I found his response amusing, but he did not refute anything that Pro said. Pro gets conduct because Con went off topic.