We Shouldn't Make the United States more Socialistic
Debate Rounds (3)
To say there needs to be "more socialism" in order to quell inequality would be a misguided and horrendous course of action.
Note that I am not arguing for a complete overhaul of USA's capitalistic system; I am merely arguing for the enforcement of some socialistic policies.
Pro will have to show why enforcing socialistic policies in the United States is a "misguided and horrendous course of action" in his arguments.
Good luck to Pro.
I look forward to an interesting debate.
Anyways, that is obviously false, as up until now, we have been a mostly capitalist society, and the bottom 40% of our population owns a mere 0.2% of the national wealth!
I have shown through example that capitalism only breeds wealth disparity; it doesn't fix it at all.
chrisChrisChris forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Jifpop09 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side put a ton of effort into debating, and knowing con, he could of. As far as sources go, no one added any, but con added some statistics, which makes his arguments more convincing. Pro forfeited.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.