The Instigator
Khaliun
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Theunkown
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

We can't love only one person for our entire life

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Theunkown
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/7/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 427 times Debate No: 64756
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Khaliun

Pro

Can we love one person for our entire life and be honest with them?Does true love exist?I think they don't exist .So I am inviting you to have a debate with me.
RULE:
YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING FROM MAGAZINE ,BOOK OR WEBSITE.IT SHOULD BE YOUR OPINION,NOT SOMEONE ELSE'S
Theunkown

Con

Honestly I am confused why sources are not allowed since it would be nice to use Psychology or Biology sources to see if attraction can be indefinite. Nonetheless I accept this rule.

As con, I will be negating the resolution and therefore I must argue the case that it is possible to love another person for an entire lifetime.
Now I could play semantics and say you will love your mom and dad your whole life but no, I assume this debate will discuss romantic love between two individuals from the moment they develop romantic feelings for each other to the time one of them dies from natural causes, lets just say age.

BoP must be on Pro so I will await his arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
Khaliun

Pro

Khaliun forfeited this round.
Theunkown

Con

obviously, I dont need to post argument
Debate Round No. 2
Khaliun

Pro

Khaliun forfeited this round.
Theunkown

Con

Forfeitors should be penalized. This is unacceptable
Debate Round No. 3
Khaliun

Pro

Khaliun forfeited this round.
Theunkown

Con

Vote for Con.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by TK57 2 years ago
TK57
KhaliunTheunkownTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: There was no debate...
Vote Placed by Gabe1e 2 years ago
Gabe1e
KhaliunTheunkownTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Um. This wasn't really a debate, but I guess that Con had better spelling and grammar, so he might win with just a point lead.