We have no right to question the motives of a chicken who has recently crossed a street.
Debate Rounds (3)
"The chicken. A noble creature majestic to an extent that we could never comprehend."
They eat corn out of their own sh**.
"Leave the chicken be."
When was the last time you actually saw a chicken just wandering around in the streets? Truth is, you haven't. You don't see chickens just roaming around outside, and if you do see one, something has gone wrong. Horribly, HORRIBLY wrong. Probably a murder. You don't see chickens crossing the streets, because you're not SUPPOSED to see them crossing the street, because its not natural, like masturbating with a shovel. Chickens dont belong out on the streets, have you ever seen a lane on the road meant for chickens? No! They are for cars, busses, high occupancy vehicles, and in some cases bicyclists, NOT CHICKENS.
Chickens DONT go out on the street, they DONT have any reason to cross the street. So when you DO see a chicken crossing the street, it is your DUTY to question why, because it is not normal. Why is that chicken out in the first place? Who does it belong to? Where is it going? Why would a chicken have a need to go anywhere? What does the chicken gain by crossing the road? Why would you NOT wonder where it could be going? What are you, a communist? An ISIS sympathizer? A Jew? A Jewish ISIS sympathizer? Do those even exist? Are you just somebody who hates America? Why? Why do you hate America? Do you hate it because people have the freedom to question why a chicken is crossing the street? What if you had reason to believe the chicken is a member of ISIS? What if you thought it had weapons of mass destruction? What if you knew that chicken was connected to 9/11? Holy sh**, that chicken is connected to 9/11? How? Why? What did it contribute to 9/11? Why is it still here and not locked up? Is this chicken still a threat to society? Why is it in my hometown? Am I in danger? What is it doing now? Where is it going? Is it crossing a street over there? Why isnt it using the crosswalks? Why is it jaywalking? Doesnt it know thats not safe? Doesnt it know that jaywalking is a crime? Why is it crossing the street in the first place? WHY? WHY IS THE CHICKEN CROSSING THE STREET?
WHY DID THE CHICKEN CROSS THE ROOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAD?!?!?!?!??!!?
The defense rests your honor.
"I do in fact see chickens in the road on a daily basis, and I am in fact not Jewish"
That sounds exactly like something a Jew would say
"Profiling is wrong, and you have committed it"
Profiling against PEOPLE is wrong, profiling against regular animals though is perfectly normal and morally acceptable. There's nothing wrong with saying that dogs sniff a**holes, or that cats ARE a**holes, because even though that would be profiling, its still spot on accurate.
" and though the chicken involved in the terrorist attack is still at large, it is not this one, as you have so wrongly accused"
And what evidence have you provided to support such a claim? We cannot disprove that the chicken crossing the road ISNT the one connected to the terrorist attack unless we investigate its motives and activity. Just saying that the chicken isnt involved in the terrorist attack isnt proof enough. We need an alibi, we should check to see if it has traveled to the middle east recently, we should check its browser history, and we should check WHY THE CHICKEN IS CROSSING THE ROAD?!?!?!
In conclusion, it is right to question the motives of chickens who cross the streets due to the number of chickens that have played a role in terrorist attacks against our nation.
Vote Con! After all, Pro admits to being an Isis sympathizer (Which is like being a Jets fan)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Eloquent, intellectual trolling. This really sounded like a troll debate (questioning the motives of a chicken .... you can't really do anything but stroke the chicken's feathers) and NOBODY can beat Con in trolling. This debate was absolutely hilarious XD.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.