This will be a 4 round argument that will remain in a civil mood throughout the entire debate. The debate will not officially start until round two as I will set aside round to for I and my challenger to exchange words and voice whatever we want to say before the debate begins officially. First off is like to make it perfectly clear that I want my guns right where they are, in the corner of my room. Secondly I would also like to say toy challenger thank you for joining this debate with me. I am very eager to see your points on this matter and hopefully have a good debate.
First off I would like to present a common thing brought forward by the people who are not for guns being legal to the public. The belief is that a town with a no guns except in the case of law enforcement, would have less crime In an overall sense. To me that makes no sense whatsoever because if a criminal wants a gun they can get one and possibly kill no matter what and the poor civilians are left helpless. It's not the normal civilians who are usually doing the killing it's the criminals and so therefore why take the civilians way of defending themselves? I mean for heavens sakes the criminals have the black market, I guarantee they can get a gun. Also, which I am not going into detail about this unless requested, Chicago is a spitting image on why guns are good. Also the crime is less severe I'm the country of Israel and why? That is because they walk around the streets with guns, Everybody. Now compare their whole crime rate to Chicago. Country Versus city. Pretty staggering.