The Instigator
Naweedyosofi
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
rethaluious
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

We live in a broken world!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
rethaluious
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/14/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 620 times Debate No: 68310
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

Naweedyosofi

Pro

We live in a broken World!
Yes we live in a broken world, where, there is not love not trust!

Please open your argue so we go forward!

Wishing u all the best!
rethaluious

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
Naweedyosofi

Pro

We live in a broken World!
Yes we live in a broken world, where, there is neither love nor trust!

We all know that in today's life, way of living is getting more modern and it separates us from our beloveds.
We are near to families but we are so far from them!

For example, Families living in Europe and America are not longer united! when the child is born they take care of them till 18 years and they pay a lot of their time and love to them for growing them, but when they reach 18 years of age they leave their parent, and the poor parents, living alone struggling all the problems, and bad times.
Parents are being taken to loneliness and they enjoy their own life, it all has a cause! they never loved their parents so their children wont love them either, though this customs being carried forward generation to generation.

We are near to families but we are so far from them! we all live in the technological world where there is no love and sharing, we think that we have many friends on Facebook or other social networks, that we chat with them and share with them, although we are alone! actually we value those friends who are unknown to us but we forget about love and sharing with our own families, because each family member is unique and they are once in our lives, though we should care about them and share our love with them to build the world and strengthen our relationships!
rethaluious

Con

Believe it or not, there are signs that the world is slowly getting better despite of bombing and crimes around the world.

Please see: http://www.cracked.com...

Rebuttals: Some families are actually broken, but not all. Europe and America are only two out out of a total of seven continents, so referring to just these two won't make the 'world' broken. Take the place, where I live for example (I currently reside in Taiwan). The children are not allowed to leave their parents behind when they already have a proper job. The government obliges them to visit their parents at least a couple times in a whole month. In this way,families stay together. I also believe that there are more families that stay together compared to the total of broken ones.


In what way does the technology separates us to our families? It is made for communication, and for improvement. These days communications just got better.


We have friends on facebook and we gain them, because from time to time, we meet new people as each day passes, and we add them as our friends on facebook so we can get in touch, and get to know more about each other. Having friends on facebook does not mean that we are actually 'friends' in real life. We aren't alone, and if we are, that does not make the world 'broken' at all.


How do you 'value those friends who are unknown to us'? Is that even possible? How did we become friends if they are unknown?People do not forget about 'love and sharing with our families', because if we do, all of our parents are probably dead by now. But there are people who still live in their 60th year because we actually care for them. We do not leave our parents' side even if they're old.

Love, trust, generosity and friendship still remains in this world.
Debate Round No. 2
Naweedyosofi

Pro

Naweedyosofi forfeited this round.
rethaluious

Con

Ouch. Extend
Debate Round No. 3
Naweedyosofi

Pro

Naweedyosofi forfeited this round.
rethaluious

Con

...So I guess you believe me now?...
Debate Round No. 4
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Naweedyosofi 2 years ago
Naweedyosofi
Damn it :(
i wasn't around..is it over ?
Posted by rethaluious 2 years ago
rethaluious
Damnit, argument not allowed to exceed 2,000 characters!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
NaweedyosofirethaluiousTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's counter-arguments were good enough to require rebuttal, but Pro provided none, so Con wins arguments. Con could have won source points had he/she fleshed out the link, but that didn't happen. Conduct to Con for Pro's round forfeits.