We should continue to fund NASA
Debate Rounds (2)
boom forfeited this round.
Since my opponent has decided to use none of the paltry 500 characters per round he was allotted to actually defend his position, I retire.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by airmax1227 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: The BOP in this debate is on Pro, who failed to meet this, especially with his FF in R2. Con makes a valid point regarding the cost of NASA versus the potential benefits of related advancements being done through the private sector. Should Pro have asserted anything in response to this that NASA is for any reason better/more efficient than the private sector and provided some data for this, he may have had a chance to defend the resolution. With no response in R2 though, Cons sole argument stands and the resolution is never defended. So Argument points go to Con. Conduct point to Con for Pro's FF.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.