The Instigator
haxandrew
Pro (for)
Losing
23 Points
The Contender
Rockylightning
Con (against)
Winning
34 Points

We should cull Asians debate 2

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
Rockylightning
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/2/2010 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 8,054 times Debate No: 11313
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (27)
Votes (10)

 

haxandrew

Pro

To start out from the last debate,
There are currently 3,879,000,000 Asian people in this world.
There is an overpopulation, it's more than half the world's population.
I shall let my opponent start out.
Rockylightning

Con

=============================Refutes============================================

To refute my opponent's one current point, they may be half of the world, but is the way to solve this to resort to cannibalism? My opponent has yet to say why we cannot use any other means of birth control. For example, China has implemented the One-Child-Policy. Which is estimated will cut the Asian population in half in one generation! This is how we solve the problem!

==================================Points========================================
1) Cannibalism is unhealthy: According to BBC and many many many other sources and research studies, cannibalism can cause "Kuru" an unfortunate epidemic where if one is infected it is almost certain death, Kuru is incurable and causes symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhea, enlarged stomach, and ultimately death. Kuru causes physiological as well as neurological effects that ultimately lead to death.
2) Cannibalism is unethical: The way the pro has presented his argument, he is saying that we kill Asians for their meat! This is completely unethical and immoral. We are not supposed to eat each other, but preserve each other!

===============================Sources=========================================
http://en.wikipedia.org...(disease)#Presentation
http://www.pnas.org...
http://www.emedicine.com...
http://content.nejm.org...

============================================================================
================================VOTE CON=====================================
============================================================================
Debate Round No. 1
haxandrew

Pro

By the way, this debate is about culling Asians, not killing them (PWNED)
Thus, making ALL his points completely out of this debate.
Anyways, to my 2 main reasons why we should cull Asians:
Overpopulation
better for the earth.

For my first reason, Overpopulation.
There are currently 3,879,000,000 Asian people in this world, which is more than half the whole world's population. There are over 200 babies born in Asia each day and only 10 die.
At this rate, the world will have an average of every 5 out of 8 people Asian.
I believe we should not cull all of the Asians, but all who were born after 2000, for this shall restore population balance to this world.
Not only will hunger decline all over the world, but the economies will smash through the roof!
The other countries can then use the unpopulated land for other uses, such as a World Dump, or even a global theme park!
And no matter what we can do to put some laws to limit the children per household, the population shall not be changed significantly for hundreds of years!
It will help the world, and that is including the earth! Less resources will be in demand, and global warming will also be largely terminated!
And if we do choose to eat Asians, which would be dangerous, as Rocky has stated, we will decline hunger even quicker, but that is if you want to take chances. And the "Kuru" disease is very rare, so this will clearly help my debate, including those who starve each day.
I will continue my points in the next round.
Rockylightning

Con

- First I would like to say that I am sorry for misreading the title, Hax sent me a challlenge that was "we should eat asians debate 2" then cancelled it while I was posting, and renamed it to we should cull asians, the catch was he told me the only change was a character limit, please realize that when you vote for him you are voting for a cheater.
==================================Refutes=====================================
1) There are 3 billion asians in the world. My opponent is resorting to the method Hitler used when he killed jews. How can we call ourselves human when we are going to kill every baby that was born after the year 2000. If hax wins, we will be killing so many asian babies! How can we call ourselves a species if we commit mass homocide that attempts to wipe out a race of people.
2) My opponent stated that hunger will decline all over the world, on the contrary, Asia produces 85% of the world's food, if we kill all these babies, who will be left to farm the farms, run the factories, and work in Asia? In fact we will STARVE!
3) My opponent stated that economies will go through the roof on the contrary (au contraire) the world economy will almost certainly collapse, with the vast Asian economy gone, how will the world's economy recover? Almost everything nowadays is made in China, where will we get these products now?
4) Again, i'm sorry for the misunderstanding, but we cannot kill all asians
====================================Conclusion=================================
I have clearly proved that culling all asians is impractical, unethical, and immoral.
====================================Final Word=================================
I would like to point out my opponent has stated NO sources, NO definitions, and NO viable way to cull Asians born after 2000.
=============================Sources=========================================
http://www.ieer.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...

=VOTE CON=
Debate Round No. 2
haxandrew

Pro

First of all, I said i needed to change the title, and you should have looked at it first.
I shall start by refuting:
1. When my opponent declared that culling the Asians would be the same act as Hitler. First of all, the Asian population is almost 4 billion, and second, Hitler did not want to kill the Jews, he just didn't want them on his land, and Hitler wanted to kill ALL the Jews after they would not leave, I stated that we should cull all Asians AFTER the year 2000. I did not say we should cull them all!
2. Since there will be less Asians, there would be more land, thus more use of it, and we could easily post a few people from each country to work there, problem solved. And you forgot about the Asians, they consume more than almost every other country, so it will definitely help us, with most of them gone.
3. And since a good chunk of the population is gone, the economy will increase because of the high demand BY Asia for resources, we will get resources such as oil for a much cheaper price, and so what if the manufactured some of our toys? We could easily just make them ourselves or buy them off another country, so no problem there.
4. And i did not state all the Asians, just those born after the year 2000.
I will now summarize my points,
Not only will culling all the Asians after the year of 2000 will clearly help everyone, including the world itself.
I have refuted all my opponent's points and thank you for this debate.

Sources:
www.chicagoreader.com
www.socialsecrets.com
Rockylightning

Con

To refute my opponent's points:
1) "Hitler did not want to kill the Jews, he just didn't want them on his land" All history records show that Hitler HATED jews, he even went out of his way to kill them, he invade other countries FOR their jews to kill. He even killed jews inside Germany! I don't see how you can side with hitler on that topic.... That point is down.
2) "Since there will be less Asians, there would be more land" an Asian born after the year 2000 is ten years old right now at most, ten year olds DO NOT OWN LAND! Their parents do! If we cull Asians born after the year 2000 years we will be killing innocent, non land owning, people! That point off the table.
3) "a good chunk of the population is gone, the economy will increase because of the high demand BY Asia for resources" for the record, America represents about 4% of the population but uses 25% of the world's resources, so if we're culling anyone, it would be Americans, but that's not the point. If an American accuses others of being resource gobbling, he is a hypocite, as my opponent clearly is. Asia represents 50% of the population and uses 45% of the world's resources.
4) "I did not state all the Asians, just those born after the year 2000" Oh that's great, killing children who don't own land, consume little resources, and will grow up to operate business in Asia such as factories, farms, etc.

Below is a graph of how much the world pop. has it's money. As you can see, the majority of the cash is with the rich, the top 1 percent.
Financial Wealth
Top 1 percentNext 19 percentBottom 80 percent
198342.9%48.4%8.7%
198946.9%46.5%6.6%
199245.6%46.7%7.7%
199547.2%45.9%7.0%
199847.3%43.6%9.1%
200139.7%51.5%8.7%
200442.2%50.3%7.5%
200742.7%50.3%7.0%

Sources:
http://www.chacha.com...
http://www.eia.doe.gov...
http://www.uic.com.au...
http://www.ei...
Debate Round No. 3
27 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Daniel-AAA 3 years ago
Daniel-AAA
haxandrew actually has the right idea, this is an issue that is quickly becoming out of hand. -AAA
Posted by nathann 3 years ago
nathann
good job haxandrew speaking for us all, im in favor for culling all asians though screw them all and heil hitler
- AAA for life
Posted by left_wing_mormon 7 years ago
left_wing_mormon
this was a good laugh
Posted by haxandrew 7 years ago
haxandrew
the debate was about Asians, so if i did a debate in which we should cull all people born after 2000, than i would accept. in a week
Posted by hauki20 7 years ago
hauki20
Here's a question for Haxandrew: Why only Asians? Why not limit the general population (via eating, killing, birth control etc) if you're so worried about overpopulation? Or is there a reason you want only asians being eaten (which i'm assuming cull means)? In my opinion, anyone wanting to reduce the human population should be the first volunteer to be killed so "the rest of humanity could survive".
Posted by deadguyon2streets 7 years ago
deadguyon2streets
hax really did a good job on this debate.
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
Votebombing is votebombing is votebombing.
Posted by Rockylightning 7 years ago
Rockylightning
@ Korashk
I only votebombed on some of those because I was losing and I just did it for the heck of it, in fact i'm still losing most of those lol.
Posted by haxandrew 7 years ago
haxandrew
are you serious, this is the only one in which you didn't votebomb yourself, you votebombed all the other ones!
Posted by Rockylightning 7 years ago
Rockylightning
hax is a votebomber
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by left_wing_mormon 7 years ago
left_wing_mormon
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by deadguyon2streets 7 years ago
deadguyon2streets
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by bongo 7 years ago
bongo
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Ninedump 7 years ago
Ninedump
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Vote Placed by HmmMaybe 7 years ago
HmmMaybe
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Vote Placed by haxandrew 7 years ago
haxandrew
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Vote Placed by DavidSSabb94 7 years ago
DavidSSabb94
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 7 years ago
Rockylightning
haxandrewRockylightningTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:25