The Instigator
Evil1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
toamatt26
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

We should euthanize all piranhas and vultures.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
toamatt26
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/9/2013 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 538 times Debate No: 41986
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

Evil1

Pro

Piranhas and Vultures are very dangerous animals and has been human kinds natural enemy since the beginning of Earth. All though many animals of many different kinds attack us humans all the time, Piranhas and vultures seem to dangerous and useless to be able to live. Scientists should create a deadly chemical to release in the air that only kill vultures. This could take years but the results when it works would be terriffic. As with the piranha problem, we should send bombs to only kill them.
toamatt26

Con

I accept the challenge.

(And 5 minutes per round is quite short)
Debate Round No. 1
toamatt26

Con

toamatt26 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Evil1

Pro

Evil1 forfeited this round.
toamatt26

Con

In the first round my opponent stated that "piranhas and vultures are very dangerous animals and has been man kinds natural enemy since the beginning of the Earth." This statement is false. Although they are very dangerous, neither mankind or the animals have been here since the beginning of the earth."All though ... to live."
All though: Although,
Many different animals of many different kinds : Many different kinds of animals
Piranhas should not be capital
-to : too
(Only500ChrctersAllowd)
Debate Round No. 3
Evil1

Pro

Evil1 forfeited this round.
toamatt26

Con

People are not allowed to interfere with nature. That is a common Daoist belief but people in any religion would know that exterminating a whole race just for the sake of "them attacking us." My opponent stated that piranhas are useless, but they are part of the food chain and every section of it contributes to the rest of the world. Also, piranhas eat all sorts of things that would be a much dangerous threat than piranhas themselves. I hope my opponent will respond and i will extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 4
Evil1

Pro

Evil1 forfeited this round.
toamatt26

Con

Pro said that "Scientists should create a deadly chemical to release in the air that only kill vultures." and for piranhas
"we should send bombs to only kill them." Not only is that an irrational action, it makes no sense. It would be very hard, if not impossible "to create a deadly chemical that only kills vultures," and it would most likely effect humans to. And you can't send bombs to kill ONLY piranhas, because there is a great possibility you will kill other species, nd wl nt end ur prblm:)
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Evil1 3 years ago
Evil1
trolled
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Evil1toamatt26Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Atrocious debate time limit. Con wins as he made the most arguments and rebutted Pro. Spelling and grammar are tied, as the word limit made bad spelling a necessity. Conduct goes to Con for actually posting more than one argument. Sources? what sources?
Vote Placed by yay842 3 years ago
yay842
Evil1toamatt26Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: although Con forfeit first, Pro forfeit more