The Instigator
Masterful
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

We should ship our fat people to Africa to be butchered for meat

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
vi_spex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/20/2016 Category: People
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 681 times Debate No: 98278
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

Masterful

Pro

I believe we should send fat people to Africa, so the starving Africans can feast on meat.
vi_spex

Con

belief=be lie
know=now
Debate Round No. 1
Masterful

Pro

Ohh you're going to pay for this you retard.
vi_spex

Con

gun beats spoon.. -winner
Debate Round No. 2
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
You can block vi_spex from accepting your future debates by going to his user page, and click "block this person".
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
Masterful, I don't even know you, and I have no reason to feel sorry for vi_spex. I simply enforce the standards as they are.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
spasticomestic.
Posted by Masterful 1 year ago
Masterful
Well Spex, I would win, but whiteflame doesn't like me. He is just bias, he thinks you're a child and feels sorry for you. Truth is you're a 28 year old man who is just spasticated.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
as if you knew what a win is
Posted by Masterful 1 year ago
Masterful
The debate was ruined the moment V_spex accepted it. stupid retard
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: ca2005// Mod action: Removed<

1 points to Pro (S&G). Reasons for voting decision: Pro used an argument, but later on it became a fight.

[*Reason for removal*] This is not an RFD. The voter has to explain the point allocation, yet fails to justify S&G anywhere.
************************************************************************
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Cat47 1 year ago
Cat47
Masterfulvi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate is obviously a joke, and Pro insulted Con.
Vote Placed by jo154676 1 year ago
jo154676
Masterfulvi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro called con a retard, making a personal attack therefore con gets point for conduct.