We should stop the Whiteman for their continued domination of the world!
Debate Rounds (3)
I would like to begin by stating definitions:
White Supremacy: "a person who believes that the white race is better than all other races and should have control over all other races"
Black Power: "The use of political and economic power by African-Americans especially as part of a social movement to promote equality and racial justice in the 1960s"
Please refer to the Miriam Webster online dictionary if you have any issues with the given definitions.
Now, I would set up my arguments into three contingencies, and then seamlessly sew them together with a conclusion.
Contingency A: Now, please use the link provided above to fully unravel my first contingent. While the topic is extremely vague, and extremely biased, I believe I have some arguments that can clear things up. First, the "Whites" continue to dominate the world, mainly because the majority of the developed world is white. Of course depending on you definition of "dominate", which I do not really think needs to be defined for this debate.
Contingency B: This will be a spot where I do a couple rebuttals to your arguments, but I believe I can do this since you did not layout the rules before the match.
"The have nukes to wipe out mankind! "
If you are referring to the major world super powers, then yes, I suppose you could be correct, however, you would only be correct in assuming that there are "whites" in these nations. However, all nations that are also superpowers have a fair amount of diversity. Except for the Asian countries, which also have nukes. Those countries are not run by "whites" and therefore, your argument is invalid. Also, Theoretically, the president of the United States has the power to launch a nuclear missile, when he feels like he needs to, this power is know as executive privilege. Can you guess the race of the president as of right now? That's right! he is African American.
Next, "And to add to this. The white man has shed more blood than any other race in the history of mankind".
This can simply be argued. The Chinese population, (which are an amazing group of people if you look at all the diversity their people have been through of the course of thousands of years) have had their fair share of blood shed. Let's look at the 40,000+ people vlad the impaler killed. Now, don't get me wrong. I believe this argument is invalid 100% because I know that the fact that skin color and ethnicity do not make you a bad person, or a connection to murders. It's somewhat racist, and it is ignorant.
For my third contingency, I would like to overall sum up my arguments. As developing nations develop, so does their populations. As the white population expanded, so did the amount of land they owned. This is true because at one point, Great Britain owned the majority of the world, including parts of Africa, and much of India. To say things like, "The white man has shed more blood than any other race in the history of mankind", has no evidence, and therefore is just an opinion.
Thank you, I am finished.
Second you mention the majority of the developed nations is white. Where did they get that development/through shedding of blood. Africa From Cape to Cairo mourns of the whitemans horrible blood shed! Even upto today millions continue to suffer because of whiteman's so called development,where it tends to be the white man only benefiting.What the f%$k is that?
You said Great Britain owned the majority of the world under whose approval.Maybe the Devils approval my guess is right!
Like I said before, on the spectrum of time, the population also increases. I never said the Chinese killed 40,000 people. I said Vlad the Impaler did that. And those numbers are no including the amount of woman, who killed themselves because they fear getting raped by him, which was another thing he did a lot.
When you said, "Africa From Cape to Cairo mourns of the whitemans horrible blood shed! Even upto today millions continue to suffer because of whiteman's so called development,where it tends to be the white man only benefiting.What the f%$k is that?"
The only real way to conquer land and develop as a nation involves others to suffer. Fortunately, nations like America and the UK would be much more gracious to lands they were conquering today, however, the fatal flaw in your entire argument, "whiteys" are no longer searching for land! Now, all issues that involve race are purely domestic.
Also, "You said Great Britain owned the majority of the world under whose approval.Maybe the Devils approval my guess is right!"
You clearly do not understand, that argument is not up for debate. This is a true fact. And the majority of lands who were conquered by Great Britain were okay with it, and it brought a booming economy, and protection from other invaders. The evidence I will supply for this is India. When they were invaded, the adopted English, which is why many Indians in India speak English- because they learned it from the English who came over. India was also always divided, and when "whiteys" came, they brought India together, to formally create a nation. Also, I do not remember ever hearing of America conquering parts of Africa. I really don't remember any white people trying to go over and establish African land for their territory, however, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Understand that us "whiteys" have finished conquering land, and have been finished for a while now. We are now focused on domestic issues, and to issues in the middle east.
Since you did not give an argue to virtually any of my arguments, I will just assume that you agree with them.
I also believe you are missing the big picture- overall development requires blood to be shed! which is why things like the Rwanda Genocide occurred. Where 500,000-1,000,000 people died! In Rwanda and other places effected by the genocide, this was a huge number!
I would also like to point out, that though out the entire debate, you have provided no evidence to why "whiteys" should be stopped, or even how. You have just talked about things through out history, however, all of these arguments are invalid because it is not 1234! it's 2014, and America has an African American president, and soon we could be looking in the face of the first female president!
Developed nations with a somewhat mediocre economy have realized that more land isn't a good thing anymore. Like America, we've recognized A) there is no more land we can take. And B) taking more land would hurt us financially.
I would also like to answer your question, "But how many quadrillions have the white man killed since the beginning of history!"
The answer is simple, I have no idea!
But allow me to explain something to you. The closer you move down to the equator, the darker peoples skin is. This is why Africans/African-American are black, and Europeans are prominently white. This is because more sun hits the equator, thus, more UV rays hits the people on the equator. Therefore, skin darkened over time to adapt to the conditions. Therefore, the first humans were probably white. Is this racist, or absurd? Of course not! Using scientific knowledge, it can be said that all living things must adapt to survive, and this was the most ingenious was the human body could adapt!
If white people had been around longer, their populations would rise, and therefore causing more deaths. Also, I would like to point out that through the history of time, there have never been a "quadrillion" people on earth.
Now, "Africa From Cape to Cairo mourns of the whitemans horrible blood shed! Even upto today millions continue to suffer because of whiteman's so called development"
I would like to point out that "whiteys" are not in Cairo, Egypt to kill Egyptians. If there are any, it is to protect the civilians who need protection.
Finally, you treat "whiteys" like they just have an aryan army, ready to at any time. However, this is not true. All military of developed countries have mixed races, and it has been this way for a few years now. You can argue that you need to stop the white man from conquering the rest of the world, however this is invalid as well. "whiteys" are no longer interested in the rest of the world"
Thank you, I am finished
Back to my point that white mans domination should be stopped because Pro agrees with me that white man shed more blood in history of the human history to conquer.His says and l quote'Of course l agree with you in order to conquer blood must be shed'. There he goes he said it.And further more he continues to point out in Nigeria and the North Korea how they have been successful because they shed blood to conquer. White man set up systems in these very countries brought guns and pornography in the name of development,brainwashed them and used all the tricks in the book to bring down their self esteem,they are no longer a people because of what the white man has turned him into. They push for gay rights in Africa something outlawed in the bible!.They made guns and brought them to these people, here kill each other.Just like the aids virus was created in the lab by a white man for the black people. Look at recent happenings to Zimbabwe! The once prosperous country in Africa has been reduced to a bread basket by the western nations for its land redistribution to its people!! Now the Chinese have Nukes because the white man pointed nukes on the Chinese arses! Is this what Jesus Christ died for,l'll get to this point later.The white man have set up a system in all the world's governing systems,which l would call the 666. Its like a pyramid where the white man is on top of that pyramid.lf you don't follow the white mans system of governance you are dead either way!.
White man rules the world thats a fact! Area 51 in the United States the most secret place on earth!Whose hiding there? l guess the Devil Himself! ln the bible who rules the world?lts not me who said it,but Jesus himself! The Devil himself poses as the angel of light.Pro l hope you having answers to these serious allegations. l don't hate white people or dol say anything bad about white people,to be fair the truth be told! Who is the beast and the dragon in the bible.One would argue!.All People should love each no matter what race you are rather than one race playing devil!
My opponent in the debate continues to show the suffering of the people at the hands of a white man when he says 'The only real way to conquer land and develop as a nation involves others to SUFFER...lf this man is for real then technically Islam has right to claim holy war,because God does not support such views where one superior race makes other races to suffer.You know for certain its true even up today we see it..He is a god of love.! He says love one another.Which love has the white man shown since history.Certainly l haven't seen it my be pro my opponent will be best to answer me on that one.Hope it does not envole the shedding of blood! Because the God almighty of the Koran and bible promises to punish those who have caused suffering on his people.Even in the bible God promises to punish the nation that enslaved his people! In Uganda the genocide that happen there who made the guns that caused that mass destruction?The white man.
We know the devil very tricky and cunning.He'll do what it takes to deceive that he doesn't exist when actually he does exist.How much of his evil have we seen manifesting through the white man,e.g the changing of the sabbath day from Saturday to Sunday which was declared God to be Holy!The white man changed that! Who makes guns and nukes white-man. Who pushes for gay rights? White-man.Why?Who killed Jesus?White man? Who owns money ?White-man! Who made the Aids Virus white man! Biological warfare White man! who brought suffering to Africa white man!. Instability in the middle east white man. The list is infinite of the crimes white man continue to do!
What should be done! l do not care what you think,rather than wishing death because l have love and l'm not a racist.l feel the white mans mentality should be crushed and killed,because it is the source of suffering for all mankind who are not WHITE!
l talked about the blood that cry's from the lands of Africa the brutal history of a white mans atrocities,and pro says if they are still there they might be protecting civilians.l laughed because"protecting the civilians from whose guns'Your guns the whiteman. The white man is so deceitful in nature to the point they successfully deceived the world that Jesus was white !
"And further more he continues to point out in Nigeria and the North Korea how they have been successful because they shed blood to conquer."
I did not say this, your changing my words. I said these places aren't as successful in the means that they do not do much trading with others, and that both their people are starving.
Next, Gay rights are not outlawed in the bible. Of course it says a couple things in Leviticus about homosexuals, however this selection pertains to a time where the only way a society would become successful is in the growth of population.
"which l would call the 666. Its like a pyramid where the white man is on top of that pyramid.lf you don't follow the white mans system of governance you are dead either way!"
Now, may I ask, are you dead? you clearly do not follow the "white mans system of governance", yet, according to this statement, you ought to be dead.
"White man rules the world thats a fact! Area 51 in the United States the most secret place on earth!Whose hiding there? l guess the Devil Himself! ln the bible who rules the world?lts not me who said it,but Jesus himself! The Devil himself poses as the angel of light"
Now this, I really enjoyed reading. I found this comical. I would like to argue that cinderellas castle, disney world is the most secret place to get into. If you don't understand the reference, google it. Now, you basically just said that Jesus said that white people are the devil, when in fact, I know this not to be true. If Jesus were around today he tell you that he loves all his children, irregardless of skin color.
"My opponent in the debate continues to show the suffering of the people at the hands of a white man when he says 'The only real way to conquer land and develop as a nation involves others to SUFFER...lf this man is for real then technically Islam has right to claim holy war,because God does not support such views where one superior race makes other races to suffer."
Now, this made me kind of angry. you obviously dont know the first thing about Islam. Islam in itself is peaceful, it's just the government that is not very good. Also, might I add i'd like to bet there is not a single white man in middle eastern government.
"Because the God almighty of the Koran and bible promises to punish those who have caused suffering on his people.Even in the bible God promises to punish the nation that enslaved his people! In Uganda the genocide that happen there who made the guns that caused that mass destruction?The white man."
Next, the bible explicitly said that Jews were the chosen people. Not African Americans, and this was said when the Egyptians were enslaving the Jews. You cannot cheery-pick the bible, and then interpret the word of God all willy-nilly! It doesnt work that way!
"What should be done! l do not care what you think,rather than wishing death because l have love and l'm not a racist.l feel the white mans mentality should be crushed and killed,because it is the source of suffering for all mankind who are not WHITE!"
I suppose you need the definition of 'racist', because you clearly dont understand. If you want to end an entire race, odds are, you're a racist.
Finally, you quoted me on, "protecting the civilians from whose guns', however, once again, I never said this. Your making up arguments that I didnt say, so you can portray me as something I'm not.
Thank you, I have finished
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: con chooses merely to rebut partial arguments within religion, fails to back up anything with evidence, while pro fulfills his BoP from a multitude of perspectives. Also, should I say that con gave evidence for Whiteman's cruelty and bloodshed, completely supporting the pro side of the debate. So he essentially conceded.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.