The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
SM2
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

We'd love to irradiate your body, for our betterment, mostly.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/9/2015 Category: Health
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 389 times Debate No: 81872
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

Max.Wallace

Con

Once we pinpoint cancer, which is our meal ticket, say doctors.
SM2

Pro

I infer that I will be arguing in favour of radiation therapy.

There is one reason to do it: it kills cancer cells.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Con

Nuclear bombs would eradicate a lot of cancer, you think?
SM2

Pro

A nuclear bomb eradicates everything. There's a big difference between doing that and using a controlled amount of radiation to destroy cancer cells. There is no comparison, and it's ridiculous to make one.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Con

Everyone has cancer, that is a fact. There is no human on the planet with cancer immunity, that is a fact. What's your mission, exactly? You can tell us, please do.
SM2

Pro

... to kill cancer before it kills you.

It's one thing to make a crackpot argument, but you just haven't made an argument at all.

This debate was a waste of everybody's time.

P.S. Here's a source: https://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by SM2 1 year ago
SM2
I don't know how you infer that. I'm the only one who deigned to even consider this stupid debate (which is a shame, since it means nobody will vote on it either).
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
The bear bitch is afraid to argue with me. Cheers!
No votes have been placed for this debate.