Weed should be decriminalized
Debate Rounds (4)
1. don't be rude
2. No forfeits
3. Try to post your argument in the time allowed
Leave a comment if you are interested
Decriminalize- to remove or reduce the criminal classification or status of; especially : to repeal a strict ban on while keeping under some form of regulation
Legalize- to make legal; especially : to give legal validity or sanction to
Legalizing focuses more on the usage, taxation, and other laws surrounding it and puts the right into the hand of the federal government.
Decriminalizing focuses more on making the act of selling and owning pot legal, letting state and local government deal with regulation while letting the federal government have some say, but not full control.
I believe the second choice is best, because the regulating aspect of it should be left to the state and not the federal government. Whey has pot been illegal for so long? Because the federal government wouldn"t allow it even with all the arguments in favor of its decriminalization and legalization. Why would we put control of regulating something that they have been against for so long? It seems to take away from their trustworthiness.
"Legalizing focuses more on the usage, taxation, and other laws surrounding it and puts the right into the hand of the federal government."-Yes, essentially with legalization marijuana could be legally sold and taxed at stores, and the black market for weed would be possibly completely annihilated.
"Decriminalizing focuses more on making the act of selling and owning pot legal, letting state and local government deal with regulation while letting the federal government have some say, but not full control." Woah, no there are states rights for weed as it is. That is why 5 states have already legalized weed, this just does not make sense. Legalization is making it federally legal, decriminalization would make smoking weed not illegal, so you would not be jailed from it.
"...because the regulating aspect of it should be left to the state and not the federal government." Ummmm, why? Then you would have deeply conservative states where this would never get passed, when it is something that brings in millions of dollars in tax revenue.
"Why would we put control of regulating something that they have been against for so long?" Who has been against? What does this mean? Anyway, people are coming around to legalization.
http://www.gallup.com... This gallup poll has 58% of Americans supporting legal marijuana use... nationally. Sample size-1,015 adults, age 18 and older.
A CBS news poll has 53% in favor of legalization, 1,012 adults surveyed. http://www.pollingreport.com...
So, people are definitely coming around to the point where majority of Americans support legalization. On a side note, I think it's kind of funny that most conservatives say they just want the government out of their lives, then say they want illegal gay marriage, illegal abortion, illegal marijuana, (not saying you are a conservative, definitely not.)
Now the positives of legalization. Some U.S states have legalized marijuana by now, Colorado being a good example. It is a clear example of the benefits.
-Actually lowers crime rates, in the first 11 months of 2014, crime fell 2.2%, much more than the same time frame in 2013, when marijuana was... illegal.
-Brings in so much revenue. In June 2015, almost a year ago, sales of cannabis reached over $50,000,000. Yes, it is extremely beneficial to commerce. It opens up a whole new industry.
-$60,000,000 in tax revenue. They made so much at a point, I remember, the government Colorado actually had to give money back to its people. http://countercurrentnews.com...
I didn't mean that there aren't already states right for weed already.
Yes, people have been changing their views, but federally they haven't changed.
What I meant was federally weed has been illegal for so long. Just because the people are for it doesn't mean that it will be changed by the federal government.
but none of our arguments argue what I said that legalization is better because of the revenue so you did not give any advantages of decriminalization over legalization.
snowbunny forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Emmarie 10 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: RFD - Pro wasn't prepared to argue against legalization and could not provide arguments as to why decriminalization would be better than legalization. Pro ff'd round 4 when he specifically stated no ff's in round 1. Con's argument in favor of legalization was supported by the revenue raised in Colorado as well as the decrease in the crime rate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.