Werewolves make better lovers than zombies. (Pro)
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 5/27/2009 | Category: | Society |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 899 times | Debate No: | 8436 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (11)
|
Werewolves are an animal in the sack whereas zombies just kind of lay there like a dead fish and occasionally try to bite you. And not one of those sexy give you shivers kind of bites but actually eat your fricken neck. It's a total turn off.
Further, zombies claim they want your for your brains. But they don't seem to do anything but groan... and not in a sexy way either. No conversation no lusty toss you against the wall and howl. It's kind of sad. Werewolves clearly make better lovers than zombies. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...
Werewolves make terrible lovers. First they are violent animal like creatures that wouldn't stop long enough to have sex with you prior to ripping your throat out. You'd have to tie the beast up and then that's just bestiality and rape. That's not sexy! Zombies however are perfectly sexy. In fact, they are so sexy that within the last few years they have made not one but two movies about zombie strippers. http://www.imdb.com...... http://www.imdb.com...... Having sex with a zombie it doesn't matter what kind of lover you are... she's always moaning. Rather than care about your body or your technique the only thing that matters to her is your brains. A zombie is a real gentlewoman. Further, you don't have to worry about her dying or growing old because she won't. A little potpourri and she's just a sexy, passionate lover for life! http://en.wikipedia.org...... http://en.wikipedia.org...... And I copied your other debate basically This is a ridiculous topic. People should vote for me not only because you tried to double enter but because this topic is the dumbest and nastiest topic I have come across. People should just vote for me out of spite :) |
![]() |
|
Boooo!
Copy-Paster, stole my con argument and pasted it in. He gets no props for that. http://www.debate.org... This topic isn't lame or boring. It's actually awesome. There was a private discussion among a large number of members the other day concerning an upcoming tournament and when this topic was offered it was given rather rave reviews. Most debates on the site are pretty dry and a bit of spice, humor, sex, and zombies makes any topic a good topic. To come in here and take the debate out of spite and to be a bluenose is rather silly. I can pretty well guarantee nobody is going to spite vote against me for offering this debate topic. It's a great topic. In fact, I offered one prior to this last set and it was taken within seconds. The debate topic seems to have all the hallmarks of a fun and clever topic where neither side has a clear advantage and both sides can aptly argue the point. It's about mythological creatures which means there's no right answer and it's about sex which means it's a fun topic. You could have voiced your disapproval in a comment without ruining the debate. .. Once you go Lycanthrope, to other sex, you say "nope".
No one is lame enough to screw a zombie or a werewolf. There's like no point in comparing them. If you'll screw them you'll screw a dog or a goat. It's also pretty weird to call either of these sexy LAME ALERT!!! EVERYONE VOTE AGAINST TATARIZE! :) I'm not even promoting sex with zombies, so don't even vote for me because I'm con. Just vote against the side of the instigator Thank you |
![]() |
|
You came here to knock the topic. It would help if you had some kind of argument other than declaring the topic plainly sick and moving on. Most werewolves would be humans most of the time so clearly, if being different makes one unsexy, a werewolf in an off period would just be human. Therefore werewolves make better lovers than zombies.
I'm sure many of the readers would have loved to have had this topic, but instead, you took it just to whine about it. Boo. Thank you for reading.
Well whose fault is that? :) This topic stinks. Vote against tatarize. Thank you :) |
![]() |
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 months ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 0 |
Vote Placed by AC 2 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Tatarize 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Nails 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by komachi 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Maikuru 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Lexicaholic 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by ToastOfDestiny 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by MTGandP 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 6 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Brock_Meyer 3 years ago
| Tatarize | diety | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 2 | 1 |




















Indeed.
I guess my opinion is that it really depends on the definition. If we go by wiki, both are mythological and the best lover would be the fantasized one (probably werewolf). on the other hand, by Webster's definition, a zombie can exist (not quite like the mythological ones) whereas a werewolf does not. therefore, I would say that the actual human being would be a better lover.
but whatever. I'm not voting because it wasn't really a debate..
Spelling/Grammar - Tie
Convincing Argument - Pro - Con copied and pasted Pro's argument from another debate, so, Con never made his own argument.
Reliable Sources - Pro - Con copied and pasted Pro's argument.