The Instigator
Brooke56ink
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BLAHthedebator
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

What Gender is Better?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
BLAHthedebator
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/24/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 631 times Debate No: 67518
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (5)

 

Brooke56ink

Con

Women.
Because men are retarded jocks.
BLAHthedebator

Pro

My opponent makes an extremely sexist statement saying that women are better simply because men are supposedly "retarded jocks".

Also, both genders are equally "good". Here is why:

A) Both genders are needed to procreate. Without one gender or the other, human production cannot exist, therefore causing the human race to become extinct.

B) Both genders have their strengths and weaknesses, the way every single individual has their own strengths and weaknesses.

C) At the same time, we are all similar. Both genders have been in the military and even fought in wars. Both have taken care of the household alone, whether it be man only, or woman only. Both have the same carreers and life paths; there are literally no jobs or careers that have been reserved for man only or woman only.

=Conclusion=

My opponent makes sexist comments, which don't even support her stance.

Her case has been negated and my case has been affirmed.
Debate Round No. 1
Brooke56ink

Con

Brooke56ink forfeited this round.
BLAHthedebator

Pro

My opponent had forfeited round two.

I ask the readers to extend my arguments and vote for pro. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 2
Brooke56ink

Con

Brooke56ink forfeited this round.
BLAHthedebator

Pro

Extend. Vote pro!
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by BLAHthedebator 2 years ago
BLAHthedebator
True.
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Pro could've ran a counterplan saying that all three genders are great and no gender can be better than the other, otherwise the world would collapse into a caste system of gender discrimination dominated by males not seen since the Mid Evil times.
Posted by BLAHthedebator 2 years ago
BLAHthedebator
Those are leagues. Leagues are not considered "jobs" as they aren't actual careers. Plus, in South Korea they elected a female president.
Posted by Rubikx 2 years ago
Rubikx
Just playing devils advocate here... so don't hate on me for it.
Pro said there are no jobs exclusively for men. NFL,CFL,or NHL are all exclusively male. There are pro hockey players that are female, but not in the NHL. But I'm not aware of any professional women football leagues. President/Prime minister of the U.S and Canada respectively. There have never been female Presidents or Prime Ministers. Obviously neither of these are openly rejecting women. However, they are both examples of careers only men have been able to achieve.
Posted by BLAHthedebator 2 years ago
BLAHthedebator
@bobby what? First you say pro should concede the debate, and then you say you think pro wins?????
Posted by BobbyPandaram 2 years ago
BobbyPandaram
i think Pro should concede the debate now because Con has won proven her case fully and convincingly in just one sentence. I say Pro wins wink wink
Posted by KittyEmPhilosophy 2 years ago
KittyEmPhilosophy
I am female, and I believe that there should always be harmony and balance between the sexes; however, women should remain obediant to man, who naturaly is the dominant sex.
Posted by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
I agree with Con. My favorite gender is women
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Brooke56inkBLAHthedebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Brooke56inkBLAHthedebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Tonius5 2 years ago
Tonius5
Brooke56inkBLAHthedebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Man-o-man. Con begins with an offensive and sexist statement, but forfeits all following rounds. It's clear who won here.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
Brooke56inkBLAHthedebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF, This is a shame. I was rooting for pro
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
Brooke56inkBLAHthedebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's counter-arguments went uncontested. Conduct to Pro for Con's round forfeits.