The Instigator
missmedic
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

What, if anything, is wrong or immoral about being gay?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
missmedic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/21/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 612 times Debate No: 72114
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (2)

 

missmedic

Pro

I will be arguing that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. Since there is nothing intrinsically wrong about homosexuality from a secular perspective, do adult consensual homosexual acts and same-sex partnerships have harmful consequences?
vi_spex

Con


it is unresonable to be gay as there is no baby involved, therfore its wrong and immoral, and it is engaging in war, war being negative thoughts and ideas about self and others, and any pain i have is a limitation to my related, family, friends, my pain becomes their pain


im talking from a purely logical stand point here, i have no probs with gays personally





Debate Round No. 1
missmedic

Pro

It would be wrong and immoral to involve a baby wherther you are homosexual or heterosexual.
it's hard to argue with someone against a position in which logic was not used to form it and is not used to maintain it.
vi_spex

Con

cause and effect is logic

there comes no baby from putting your dick into another man.. therfore it is illogical, and illogical is unresonable, is unintended, is evil
Debate Round No. 2
missmedic

Pro

I was hoping for an intellectual honest debate, however your arguments are nonsence, making this debate a waste of time.
vi_spex

Con

maybe you should read the headline..
Debate Round No. 3
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by bluesteel 2 years ago
bluesteel
=================================================================
>Reported vote: Gabe1e // Moderation action: Removed<

7 points to Pro. {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: Counter vote bomb for Daniel_Nemes. Lack of RFD throughout. Until it gets removed, I will keep it here.}

[*Reason for Removal*] Counter vote bombing is not permitted. Users who continually counter vote bomb risk having their privileges removed. A counter vote bomb is really just a vote bomb.
==================================================================
Posted by bluesteel 2 years ago
bluesteel
=================================================================
>Reported vote: Daniel_Nemes // Moderation action: Removed<

7 points to Con. {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: true=vispex=right=moral I am moral=right=true}

[*Reason for Removal*] Vote bomb. This RFD is nonsensical.
==================================================================
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
we?
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
Can we be honest? Con is a troll, and he's fairly good at convincing people that he's actually just an idiot, but after a little stalking, one will discover he is simply a troll.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
Se"ms i have nothing to say to you
Posted by MarcC 2 years ago
MarcC
I'm guessing the con guy isn't gay, assuming that's the case I would like to let you know that when you say:

'it is unresonable to be gay as there is no baby involved'

when you have sex with your heterosexual partner and use any kind of birth control, you are having sex for the same reason a gay man would (pleasure).

by the way, it's unreasonable not unresonable, if your going to talk rubbish at least learn how to spell...
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
illogical*
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
the cause for a dick inside another man is illlogical intent, unresonable

death=destruction=turn my back
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
experience=now
logic=now
logic=experience
dick inside man=no experience
dick inside man = no logic

i am grim reaper
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
missmedicvi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side advanced a real case, such as why it would be good or bad to have a baby involved, or what evil is for homosexuality to than be evil. However the absence of punctuation from con, actively distracted from what little there was.
Vote Placed by simonstuffles 2 years ago
simonstuffles
missmedicvi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had better grammar throughout. Pro raised but sensible arguments. No sources were used.