The Instigator
MajorAbdul
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
birdlandmemories
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

What might establish PEACE?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
MajorAbdul
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/14/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 458 times Debate No: 45925
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

MajorAbdul

Pro

What might establish peace in this world?
birdlandmemories

Con

Since my opponent did not specify what PEACE is, I'll go ahead.

He is talking about Jeremy Peace, a famous English footballer.






Now Jeremy Peace is human, and there has been a longstanding debate about how humans were created. Nobody knows for sure. But Peace was obviously created to be a good footballer.

So we'll leave it at that for now.

Debate Round No. 1
MajorAbdul

Pro

Peace can only be established by prosperity. If we want peace in this World than we have to believe in our selves. We should have faith in our selves and in the betterment of our country. There should be proper laws against violence. Everyone should have his own rights. No guns should be allowed in public. If we want to establish Peace than we have to work together as one and that's the only way we can reach our full potential.
birdlandmemories

Con

birdlandmemories forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
MajorAbdul

Pro

MajorAbdul forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

birdlandmemories forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by oculus_de_logica 3 years ago
oculus_de_logica
Urm, This isn't a debate topic. There isn't a resolution to debate over, it's a question.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
MajorAbdulbirdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: ff and fail to ima-snipe due to lack of responses
Vote Placed by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
MajorAbdulbirdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Clever tactic from con, but the arguments from either side were just as good, but both rather poor of quality. Despite many forfeits in this debate, con forfeited first, ergo he loses conduct points.