The Instigator
volcan
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
JKL
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

What total war game is better Empire(pro) or Napoleon(con)?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
volcan
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/3/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 541 times Debate No: 69372
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

volcan

Con

round 1:acception and reasoning

round 2,3:main arguments

round 4: rebuttal

I believe Napoleon is better.
JKL

Pro

FACTS of Napoleoe::

Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After EATING political power in France in a 1799 coup d""tat, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.
Debate Round No. 1
volcan

Con

thanks for accepting this debate

My first argument is that the campaigns adds attrition to part of the campaign map adding realism. Depending on the location, armies will lose men due to heat or snow. Turns in Napoleon: Total War represent two weeks, while empire sported turns that were the equivalent of at least six months. Additionally the game's artificial intelligence system had been modified.A new physics system had been implemented for the real-time battles, so that when cannonballs hit the ground, for instance, they leave impact craters. Gunpowder smoke lingers and reduces visibility in protracted engagements. There are a number of environmental factors that affect battlefield tactics: gunpowder backfires when it rains, and the elevation of landscape affects the range of munitions.
JKL

Pro

Ahh the egg
Debate Round No. 2
volcan

Con

That does not help your argument.

Napoleon is also better suited to multiplayer with its multiplayer campaign mode and Multiplayer drop-in battles, where you can face human opponents in your single player campaign battles. It also has a lot more choices in diplomacy like joining in a war your allies are in and can make a nation break a alliance
JKL

Pro

JKL forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
volcan

Con

In conclusion Napoleon is a better game because of added realism, two week turns, better battle system physics, the new multiplayer and better diplomacy options.
JKL

Pro

JKL forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by volcan 2 years ago
volcan
is this guy a troll
Posted by 16kadams 2 years ago
16kadams
empire is the sh!t I love it
Posted by donald.keller 2 years ago
donald.keller
I might accept this...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
volcanJKLTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture