What's the difference between a duck?
Debate Rounds (5)
The big question here is: is it true? Or isn't it? Is there a difference? Can there possibly be a difference?
To answer this question, I want to use logico-bullshittical reasoning and demonstrate that yes, it isn't true that there are answers to the question, one of which is false.
Protractors may not be used. Please consult your physician, dentist, and/or best friend Sergei before accepting this debate.
VOTERS: Please vote carefully, yet spontaneously and with a bit of a flourish.
I'm a capitalist
We don't give a damn about the difference between ducks
We care about money. The kind that you slap across the poor's face to make them feel the joys of capitalism.
Also I love war. More ways to spend money....On how to kill people.
I suggest you drop the debate because capitalism is more important than ducks
So he says, allegedly. Can he prove it, though?
"I'm a capitalist"
So? Why? What? Who? What was the question, again?
"We don't give a damn about the difference between ducks"
See how he is, disregarding the most important philosophical problem of our age! What a slackard!
"We care about money. The kind that you slap across the poor's face to make them feel the joys of capitalism."
But should you? Come to think of it, what does 'should' mean? I think it has something to do with multiple universes...
"Also I love war. More ways to spend money....On how to kill people."
"I suggest you drop the debate because capitalism is more important than ducks"
That's a bad reason to do stuff? Or is it? In an alternate universe where I were to drop the debate, would an unknowable quality be any different? Would it matter (of course it would, I'm playing Satan's lawyer)?
If there were no ducks. Guns would not be bought to hunt them. Without that many guns to shoot them gun stores would close down. Then Ann the manager would have no money to help her kids survive. And then those kids wont grow up to be factory workers being ripped off. AND THEN THE WHOLE SYSTEM JUST BREAKS DOWN.
And that is why ducks are important to capitalism.
Also The most Important philosophical problem in our age is DUCKS!?!?!? NO!! Its about how we rip off people without them getting mad at us. Its the constant struggle in life.
Stuff..... A noun used to describe anything in the world. "Hey honey I just brought stuff for dinner" or if used in a more sinister way "What stuff did you do to the Jews in the concentration camp". The whole theory of dropping the debate in an alternate universe is impossible due to the fact that you will drop the debate in this universe thus making it impossible for your alternate universe debater to give up because he in fact will actually continue the debate due to you dropping this debate in this reality
Ergo vote Pro
If there were ducks. Guns would be bought to hunt them. With that many guns to shoot them gun shops wouldn't close down. Then Queen Anne would have fees to help her kids live. And then those kids shall grow up to be makeplace workers being ripped off. AND THEN THE WHOLE THING DOESN'T BREAK DOWN.
And that is why ducks don't matter to heading.
Also The pickle of wisdom that matters the least in our age is DUCKS!?!?!? YES!! Its about how we don't rip off folk without them getting mad at us. It's'nt the forever fight in life.
Stuff..... A name used to mean nothing in the world. "Hey honey I just brought no stuff for eat" or if used in a less evil way "What stuff didn't you do to the Jews in the squeezed camp". The whole thingy of doing the fight in another world is yes due to the fact that you will do the fight in this world thus making it yes for your other world fighter to go on because he in fact will really stop the fight due to you doing this fight in this world
Ergo kill Pro
Only the godless communists speak like that
Oh and sorry I couldn't respond quicker. I was taking a nap in my 20 story gold plated mansion
Now what does is mean for something to be different? Here I should like to say: One that is, and another that is other. There is an 'otherness' about the duck that is up for question here. Is this swimming quacking thing 'otherly'? Does it have 'otherhood'? This, in essence, is the foundation from which truth is built.
The otherhood of that which swims and quacks is dependent on something else otherly existing, like a pond, a frog, or a bullrush. The duck is 'othered' from these distinct concepts that surround it.
Ergo, vote someone.
Because I have made clear that my opponent is a communist
Communists are evil
So vote for someone who isn't evil
PS: No one cares about ducks
Yugoslavia is best Slavia
best means good
communism is good
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Evan_Of_Hearts 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: I am so confused...
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.