Which car company has the most pretty fastest cheapest car
Debate Rounds (4)
(though can we do this and the other argument two)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct throughout the debate. S&G - Con. Pro had several spelling and grammar issues in nearly every round. While Con also had some minor grammar issues, they weren't nearly as much as Pro's. Arguments - Tie. The fastest car was Con, the cheapest was Pro, and prettiness is entirely subjective to the perceiver. Thus it's 1/1 with the third category being something I can't objectively measure as a judge. Sources - Con. Pro didn't utilize any sources in this debate whereas Con did in the final round. Thus, Con wins sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.