The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Cooldudebro
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

White fingers and thumbs, the encouragement of racism.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Cooldudebro
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/18/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 686 times Debate No: 60635
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (4)

 

Max.Wallace

Con

Why are all the self representative picture choices on this site clearly white when it comes to fingers and thumbs? Clearly this is a racist site.
Cooldudebro

Pro

I am assuming you have the BoP since you didn't clarify and you were the instigator. So, let's get on the business shall we? From what I see here, you are Pro instead of Con.


LET THE AUDIENCE NOTE THAT MY OPPONENT IS PRO AND I AM CON!


Rebuttal 1: Logical Fallacies

Con makes an assumption that since there is not a black finger or thumb, the site is racist. Let me point out something.


THE SITE HAS BLACK AVATARS

So, under my opponent's logic, all the avatars would be white, not black.


Case 1: African Americans joining the site.


If this site was racist, then why do they put the a race option for African American? Think about a good answer.


These arguments are to test if this is a troll debate. I want my opponent to respond before I go any further.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Con

My point is that the site is anti lighter skinned folk, disprove that, please.
Cooldudebro

Pro

Wait, how the hell did we skip round 2?


Case 1:

If this site is racist against whites, then why are there white avatars?

Case 2:

How can this site be racist when they put in the race section, an option to be white?

Case 3:

Based on demographics given by the site itself, the site is 62 percent white. (1) If it was racist towards whites, why are there so many whites on the site?


BoP is on you. You must prove your side, and prove all my cases wrong to win.




1. http://www.debate.org...
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
this debate is clearly rigged, and the voters are pure capitulates to the power.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Have you noticed yet? the lack of regard to a light skinned debateer? hmmmmmmmmmmm. we are not all fools.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Trolls at the controls, that is where round 2 went.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
The strangest thing happened in this debate, it was unnatural and against the rules. I will file a claim.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
WHY DID ROUND 2 GET SKIPPED FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was not by the debaters., who then?
Posted by Hayven 2 years ago
Hayven
This is stupidest comment ,lighten up,
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
round 2 was not skipped by us, and Avatar skipped us past it, which I believe validates the folly of this.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
cleared buy the dawrinians!!!!!!!, those that understand evolution? or try to rule it?
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
you are a Con, in waiting, no doubt here.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
tomalla tomalla! we start the day with a smile!!!!!!!!!! fun!!!!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by schachdame 2 years ago
schachdame
Max.WallaceCooldudebroTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Total apathy from Con. Strange and confusing debate. This all goes against the Instigator. Conduct and Arguments to Pro.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
Max.WallaceCooldudebroTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did nothing. Where'd Round 2 go?
Vote Placed by JasperFrancisShickadance 2 years ago
JasperFrancisShickadance
Max.WallaceCooldudebroTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't prove his point and Pro refuted the subject line which Con was for.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
Max.WallaceCooldudebroTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: con did nothing