Who is a better Skateboarder Tony Hawk or Ronnie Creager
Debate Rounds (3)
what about ronnie creager? could you say the same about him?? no you couldn't. Tony Hawk is and always will be the best skateboarder this world has ever seen.
Also Tony Hawk and his company donated much money to charity. would ronnie do that? so in my opinion Tony is a better Skateboarder.
Like other pros, Ronnie has to deal with an unpredictable travel schedule where he has to leave for a month on a day's notice, but such is the life of a pro rider. Still, there is nothing else that Ronnie would rather do, and when asked what he does when he's not skating, his answer: "I think about tricks that would be good in lines and find spots that look fun. My brain is thinking about skateboarding pretty much 24 hours a day."
At 31, Ronnie is a veteran in his sport but still throwing down big time. Displaying both his smooth style and technical skills, he walked away with a win and a check for $20 grand at the prestigious Globe World Cup skateboarding finals in Melbourne, Australia in 2004. He had the fans leaping out of their seats and said of the comp, "I really tried to slow it down, land my tricks and just have fun. Globe World Cup is the gnarliest competition with the greatest skaters, and there is no way I'll miss it next year." In 2003 at the Globe World Cup, he took 8th place. Getting better with age Ronnie? With an attitude like that and tons of talent, check him out if you get a chance. You might just see him taking down some more young guns."
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: 1) Never heard of Ronnie Creager, so pro was off to a good start from the beginning. 2) Pro used stats to show why Hawk was better, Con relied on opinions which sealed the deal for the pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.