The Instigator
mauricio2
Con (against)
Losing
16 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Pro (for)
Winning
17 Points

Who wants to win a debate? :D

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
lannan13
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/21/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 951 times Debate No: 20532
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (9)

 

mauricio2

Con

I honestly suck at debating and just want to get my third debate out of the way so I could start voting and maybe start learning a thing or two about debating. to who ever excepts this challenge I love you . only except if you love me back<3 . or else I'll b e crushed Report this Argument
lannan13

Pro

You'll learn a lot, but voting isn't all it is cracked up to be.
Facts:
Palestine has its own seasame street with a Jewish monster that eats babies
They teach there kids to hate America
They have a Jewish eating rabit
Debate Round No. 1
mauricio2

Con

Okay so why do they hate us?
lannan13

Pro

we're Christian, they're Muslim. It's human nature to have an enemy.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by Ron-Paul 5 years ago
Ron-Paul
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wanted to lose.
Vote Placed by MasterKage 5 years ago
MasterKage
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Tying this.
Vote Placed by Lordknukle 5 years ago
Lordknukle
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con explicitly stated that he does not want to win a debate.
Vote Placed by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: This was not a debate. Neither side deserves a vote.
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: tie tie tie
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 5 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro wanted to win
Vote Placed by Stephen_Hawkins 5 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: lad. Tie the debate.
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: It should, but Con didn't provide sources, so sources goes to Pro. Besides, mauricio2 is Con to the topic, "Who wants to win a debate", implying he doesn't want to win.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
mauricio2lannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This should be a tie.