The Instigator
Lilblack4444
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
persianimmortal
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Who would win USA and UK VS RUSSIA china and north korea no nukes

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
persianimmortal
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/13/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 333 times Debate No: 83865
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Lilblack4444

Pro

USA and UK would win hands down
persianimmortal

Con

Since there are no terms, I will assume that there are no rules except for the standard no swearing and providing proof rule.

So let's begin...

A war with the China, Russia and N.Korea, would utterly destroy American and British powers in a heart beat and here's how.

China would be spearheading the offensive in terms of the economic cutoff with the US, while North Korea would launch an all-out ground assault, diverting the American attention from its external influence, and Russia providing air support and naval blockades. The US is currently in tremendous debt to the Chinese government and a war between them will cause famine and an immediate apocalypse in the US. However we must take into account that the majority of the American influence in the world, depends on its military bases and the extraction of resources in those specific regions. The bulk of the American military is in the mainland therefore the quick overrun of such external military bases will be swift and effortless, considering the foreign populations sentiments toward an American occupation. So with the economic and naval blockade, ground assault, air support, and local assistance, the Americans will be totally cutoff from the external world and will only rely on its allies to assist them in their liberation.

The UK is probably more in danger than the US. The throne will not involve English military but rather they rely on its dominions such as Jamaica, Canada, Australia and so on, to defend it. Therefore by law of the British Monarchy, those nations are obligation to provide troops, weapons and financial assistance in the defense of the British Crown. There currently exists pockets of local resistance in these dominions that are actively against the Crown, through social media and public interactions. A war such as this will give them the opportunity the have been waiting for to attack the Loyalists and reclaim what the Brits took from them in the first place and that was their identity. It is common knowledge that England has no resources other than wheat and therefore it would be much easier to shut off the English from access to their dominions who provide them the necessities of life. Earlier, we saw the Scots attempting to separate from the UK and the Irish have great resentment towards the English. So over the course of history, the UK has collected a huge list of enemies that want to destroy the English.

So with nothing but allies at this point, theres no other option but total surrender of the American and British forces to the Chinese, Russian, and N.Korean alliance. (Interestingly, if you combine the abbreviations of US and UK, it says USUK, meaning you suck. therefore we can begin with saying to both military superpowers, "U SUK')

your turn
Debate Round No. 1
Lilblack4444

Pro

Lilblack4444 forfeited this round.
persianimmortal

Con

Russia NKorea and the Allies will dominate...no ragrets
Debate Round No. 2
Lilblack4444

Pro

Lilblack4444 forfeited this round.
persianimmortal

Con

Winnable...
Debate Round No. 3
Lilblack4444

Pro

Lilblack4444 forfeited this round.
persianimmortal

Con

Any chance you'll respond?
Debate Round No. 4
Lilblack4444

Pro

Lilblack4444 forfeited this round.
persianimmortal

Con

Vote Con. Because clearly there's nothing to vote about on the opposing side :/
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
Lilblack4444persianimmortalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
Lilblack4444persianimmortalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture