The Instigator
TShorney
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

Who would win in a fight a hippos sized lobster or a hippo?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
lannan13
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/24/2012 Category: Science
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,689 times Debate No: 25791
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (9)
Votes (3)

 

TShorney

Pro

I Say the Hippo would win.
lannan13

Con

I accept I'll be defending stating that the world's largest 400 lb. lobbster can defeat a hippo.http://science.howstuffworks.com...
In the words of the great Imabench...
It's on like Donkey Kong.
Debate Round No. 1
TShorney

Pro

your argument is invalid, hippo would win
lannan13

Con

We can go back and forth all day. A giant 400 lb. lobster can easily defeat a hippo, how? It's simple you have yet to provide evidence on what kind of hippo, so until you bring up what type of hippo your defending we can all assume that your hippo is an infant African hippo.

Contention 1: Claws
My giant lobster has giant claws and in a fight against a baby hippo it would be easy for the lobster to crush its neck with it's giant claws thus winning the fight.

Contention 2: Water
The giant lobster is able to live under water longer than the hippo so if the battle gets to devious then the lobster can retreat into a water fight and win by holding the hippo under water and the hippo will drowned.
Debate Round No. 2
TShorney

Pro

your argument is fundamentally flawed. hippo would win
lannan13

Con

My opponet has failed to refute my arguements all points extended.
Debate Round No. 3
TShorney

Pro

I would like to point out, that my opponent refuses to accept my point, and as of yet has failed to respond to the original question, with a clear mind set
lannan13

Con

My opponet is clearly trolling and has yet and hasn't answered any of my arguements. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 4
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by debate_power 3 years ago
debate_power
Embrace Hippopotamy! Only nonbelievers would doubt the power of the sacred animal, the hippopotamus!
Posted by TShorney 5 years ago
TShorney
THEN VOTE FOR me
Posted by bossyburrito 5 years ago
bossyburrito
Hippo would win
Posted by TShorney 5 years ago
TShorney
remember guys, a vote for me is a vote for the beastly hippo
Posted by bossyburrito 5 years ago
bossyburrito
Hippo would win is my new catchphrase.
Posted by TShorney 5 years ago
TShorney
I aint a troll, there is no argument which can mean a hippo would win
Posted by lannan13 5 years ago
lannan13
depending on the hippo ; ) it could be lobster vs. a hippo animal cracker
Posted by bossyburrito 5 years ago
bossyburrito
Hippo would win
Posted by AlwaysMoreThanYou 5 years ago
AlwaysMoreThanYou
Pro is a troll?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Chicken 5 years ago
Chicken
TShorneylannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Dat troll
Vote Placed by Clash 5 years ago
Clash
TShorneylannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ignored all of Con's arguments and mostly just trolled.
Vote Placed by AlwaysMoreThanYou 5 years ago
AlwaysMoreThanYou
TShorneylannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Seriously, this is the absolute worst debate I can recall seeing. Pro ignored all of Con's arguments, and made a single assertion as his case which he reiterated throughout the debate without substantiation.