Who would win in a nuclear war? Russia or the United States of america
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Justinisthecrazy
| Started: | 4/6/2009 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 10 months ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 708 times | Debate No: | 7719 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (11)
Votes (7)
|
I believe that the russians would most indefinetly win in a nuclear war in the united states because of the amount of nuclear weapons they have stockpiled over the years. Also seeing that russian technology rivals the US in many ways, a person can determine that the basic russian soldeirs equipment and traning are far more superior to that of americans. Unfortunately fo the US armed forces Russians soldiers recieve harsher more effective traning. with both of these things combined russia may win
My opponent took the Russian side. I will be saying neither side would win. A limited nuclear weapons exchange between Pakistan and India using their current arsenals could create a near-global ozone hole, triggering human health problems and wreaking environmental havoc for at least a decade, according to a study led by the University of Colorado at Boulder. Imagine the events if two of the worlds largest arms dealers exchanged? massive dead Neither side would win because everyone one would die |
![]() |
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Glitchy 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by DSanteramo 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Vote Placed by grayron 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by wjmelements 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Johnicle 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by JBlake 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by brendizzle29 10 months ago
| grim706 | Justinisthecrazy | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Show people this debate by sending them this public link:














Harsher yes, more effective no.
Second, there is no contest, there will be no war, America has a GDP of $13 trillion while Russia has a GDP of $1.3 trillion. WE ARE 10 times larger.
Third, While America has a fewer number of weapons, that is only because we ours are more effective.
America has 4,075 active and 5,400 total.
Russia has 5,162 active and 14,000 total.(1)
While Russia has a larger total number, only one in three is active due to the fact that they are broke and unable to maintain their arsenal. America has four out of five active and ready. Russia may have more, but the truck carrying them to the launch pad would probably break down and they would not be able to launch it.
Fourth, America has been buying nukes from Russia for years now and helping them dispose of them properly. In fact, America is building an interstate between the port of Savannah, GA to the Oak Ridge national laboratory in TN primarily for the purpose of transporting Russian nuclear warhead material to Oak Ridge to be recycled or destroyed.
If Russia can kick America's *** in a nuclear war, why are they selling us their arsenal as scrap? Because it is scrap.
1. http://en.wikipedia.org...
Also, isn't this debate about 20 years past relevancy?
What is this crap?