The Instigator
debateman00
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Valkrin
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Who's weirder, you or me?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Valkrin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/5/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 473 times Debate No: 66434
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

debateman00

Pro

Bring it, son.
No rules...have fun!
(And by pro I mean I'm weirder)
Valkrin

Con

I accept this debate challenge, and wish to prove I am "weirder" than Pro.
Best of luck.
Debate Round No. 1
debateman00

Pro

Turkey butts
Eat old fruit salad
Fat whales
Shirley Temple
Dumb and Dumber
Zoo-wee mama
yoyoyo yipeeyi yippeyay
everbody dance now
Heeeeeey, seeeexay
Valkrin

Con

Weird: suggesting something supernatural; uncanny, OR induce a sense of disbelief or alienation in someone. [1]

Opponent wishes to prove that he is more alienated, or more uncanny, than I.

To start off, Pro's argument is mainly nonsensical ramblings. As the BoP is shared, we each must prove that one is weirder than the other. By saying ramblings, Pro has not proved anything, except that he can come up with random phrases, such as "Fat whales", "Zoo-wee mama", and "Heeeeeey, seeeexay".

Since I am an introvert, I would naturally feel better being isolated from others for a little while.
This is one case where I would feel more alienated than Pro, therefore more "weird".
Looking forward to R2.

Sources: http://www.google.com...
Debate Round No. 2
debateman00

Pro

IN the past we have gotten into an argument at lunch about weirdness. At this argument I called you weird, and you said, "I'm not, you are."
I rest my case
Valkrin

Con

Anecdotal stories outside of a debate cannot be used to prove content inside a debate. You could be lying, for all the voters know.

I could say "You saw me turn a trash can into a chicken" and it wouldn't do any good for me. There's no proof to back that statement up.

Another reason why I am weirder than Pro:
Mysteriousness.
As one famous quote by Sun Tzu says:
"Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate."
If I have the ability to be mysterious I can direct my opponent's fate.
As such I have directed yours.
Thank you for the debate.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Valkrin 2 years ago
Valkrin
Well it's not arrogance, more of a truth. :P
Posted by debateman00 2 years ago
debateman00
Arrogant much?
But then I am too, so...
Posted by Valkrin 2 years ago
Valkrin
Indeed
Posted by debateman00 2 years ago
debateman00
Nicely done.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by BLAHthedebator 2 years ago
BLAHthedebator
debateman00ValkrinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con completely crushes Pro's arguments by refuting that anecdotal stories could be lies.