Why Pro-Wrestling is a force to be reckoned with.
Debate Rounds (5)
LET THE GAMES BEGIN
How wrestling could be considered to be a "force" perplexes me in and of itself.
In what way is pro wrestling a force to be reckoned with?
Again the numbers speak for itself. The World Wrestling Entertainmet Incorperated is grossing profits like never before. TNA iMPACT, once from NWA, grossed enough to put its indistry on television. Rings around the world are continuously sold out. WWE is a more social invested and talked about more than any other sport on the Internet today (it's there surprisingly). That's is why it is a force to be wreck ones with.
If you want to play semnatics and unfairly win, go for it.
We both know that wrestling is a sport and not a force to be reckoned with.
It is me who is the true victor.
force to be reckoned with force to be reckoned with force to be reckoned with force to be reckoned with
I am not sure if this was a joke.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to Con because Pro could not define his resolution and give an account for what A force to be reckoned with means other that just saying it's a figure of speech.....Messy debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.