The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Why US should not have dropped the bomb

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
meccaking has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/13/2016 Category: Education
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 502 times Debate No: 96982
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




The U.S should not have bombed Japan because I feel that it was an easy way out. The US should have fought them instead of bombing them. I also feel that they should not have bombed Japan because they killed many of innocent civilians. The third reason why I think the US should not have bombed Japan is because Japan was already getting ready to surrender, it would not have been long before they surrendered but Truman decided to drop another bomb.


Okay, so you said that we should've fought them. That would result in far more US casualties, and continue to drag the war on, the bombs were necessary to save lives. Second, dropping them on major population centers was the only way to get Japan to surrender. Third, the Japanese were stated that they would not surrender after the first bomb. If we didn't drop the second, then countless more Russian, American, and Japanese lives would be lost.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.