The Instigator
clashofclans
Pro (for)
Winning
2 Points
The Contender
Pitbull15
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Why are monsters not real?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
clashofclans
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/18/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 585 times Debate No: 46198
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

clashofclans

Pro

First round is acceptance
Good luck to con and hope you like this topic
Pitbull15

Con

I accept thy challenge.
Debate Round No. 1
clashofclans

Pro

Monsters are not real
First: Monsters are fun in movies but they are not real
Second: Monsters could be real but they are not proven
Conclusion: I think that monsters are cool but they are not real
Pitbull15

Con

Monsters are real
First: Monsters SUCK!!!
Second: Monsters are real because my ex-girlfriend's alive so who knows what else is out there.
Conclusion: Monsters suck and they're real.

http://www.bing.com...
Debate Round No. 2
clashofclans

Pro

You don't really have any proof to your statement
But like i said monsters are seen in movies but are movies real? Some are but the ones with monsters are fake
for example the Loch Ness monster, it has been reported many times but there really is no EVIDENCE
Pitbull15

Con

Here's a picture of my ex-girlfriend. Proof that monsters exist.

http://9gag.com...
Debate Round No. 3
clashofclans

Pro

shes not a monster
you didn't state your proof
Pitbull15

Con

Pitbull15 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Jifpop09 3 years ago
Jifpop09
Your position is unclear.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
clashofclansPitbull15Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: This was a debate without any substantial arguments. Conduct to Pro for Con's forfeit.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
clashofclansPitbull15Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con arguments are not sufficient to say that "Monsters" are real neither Pro's arguments were not satisfies that "Monsters" are not real.