The Instigator
Aizhas
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RationalMadman
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Why did Obama won, while Romney did lead in debates.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
RationalMadman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/11/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,000 times Debate No: 27133
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (5)

 

Aizhas

Pro

hi everybody, today I'm gonna talk about elections.
Voting period is 1 week
Rounds are 2
Time to argue is 3 days
RationalMadman

Con

I accept.

State your case pro.
Debate Round No. 1
Aizhas

Pro

I'm actually for Obama, but how come Romney leaded his debate if he only supported rich families, is it fare for everyone? And I want to add that Obama 4 years ago promised too much and didn't done his work, do u think he will do his "work" for this time?
RationalMadman

Con

It's Romney who only wants to help rich famlies, Obama is helping create a middle class, he also was very successful in all areas other than economics in his last term, perhaps this area of weakness will be solved this term. Yes definitely because he promised it we can think so, romney only cared about upper class.
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Torvald 4 years ago
Torvald
You can't blame a single person for an entire economy, and the crises involved therein.
Posted by One_Winged_Rook 4 years ago
One_Winged_Rook
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org...

The Middle-Class has gotten smaller and poorer between 2001-2011.

You can blame some of that on Bush too, but I don't think Obama is helping (the often-stated $4,000 annual income decrease for the middle class over the last 4 years)

Romney for the Rich, Obama for the Poor and the Rich.... no one for the middle class
Posted by Torvald 4 years ago
Torvald
Obviously not. All of these new users are hopping in and reading nothing before they haphazardly go starting debates. Two round debates, one round debates, 500 character debates, five minute debates. It's ludicrous.
Posted by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
Pro, ever heard of the forums?
Posted by RationalMadman 4 years ago
RationalMadman
*facepalm*
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by ThomasJefferson 4 years ago
ThomasJefferson
AizhasRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Haha. I guess Con presented a stronger argument here, whereas Pro seemed to just ask questions.
Vote Placed by BobbyYaz 4 years ago
BobbyYaz
AizhasRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Wasn't even really a debate.
Vote Placed by Torvald 4 years ago
Torvald
AizhasRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: There really wasn't enough of a debate here to do much judging. Pro's spelling was atrocious, so Con gets the point for that. Convincing arguments to Con as well, since he, well, argued better than did Pro.
Vote Placed by BeverlyRomni 4 years ago
BeverlyRomni
AizhasRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: language to Con, and the debate was too short to really be debated very well
Vote Placed by baggins 4 years ago
baggins
AizhasRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side deserves a vote...