The Instigator
orange
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Why the drinking age should be lowered in the U.S

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
orange
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/9/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,396 times Debate No: 20301
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)

 

orange

Pro

The legal drinking age should be lowered to about 18 or 19 and young adults allowed to drink in controlled environments such as restaurants, taverns, pubs and official school and university functions. In these situations responsible drinking could be taught through role modeling and educational programs. Mature and sensible drinking behavior would be expected. This opinion is based upon reaserch that I have been involved in for over twenty years concerning college age youth and the history of drinking in the United States and other cultures.

Although the legal purchase age is 21 years of age, a majority of college students under this age consume alcohol but in an irresponsible manner. This is because drinking by these youth is seen as an enticing "forbidden fruit," a "badge of rebellion against authority" and a symbol of "adulthood." As a nation we have tried prohibition legislation twice in the past for controlling irresponsible drinking problems. This was during National Prohibition in the 1920s and state prohibition during the 1850s. These laws were finally repealed because they were unenforceable and because the backlash towards them caused other social problems. Today we are repeating history and making the same mistakes that occurred in the past. Prohibition did not work then and prohibition for young people under the age of 21 is not working now.

The flaunting of the current laws is readily seen among university students. Those under the age of 21 are more likely to be heavy -- sometimes called "binge" -- drinkers (consuming over 5 drinks at least once a week). For example, 22% of all students under 21 compared to 18% over 21 years of age are heavy drinkers. Among drinkers only, 32% of under age compared to 24% of legal age are heavy drinkers.

Research from the early 1980s until the present has shown a continuous decrease in drinking and driving related variables which has parallel the nation's, and also university students, decrease in per capita consumption. However, these declines started in 1980 before the national 1987 law which mandated states to have 21 year old alcohol purchase laws.

The decrease in drinking and driving problems are the result of many factors and not just the rise in purchase age or the decreased per capita consumption. These include: education concerning drunk driving, designated driver programs, increased seat belt and air bag usage, safer automobiles, lower speed limits, free taxi services from drinking establishments, etc.

While there has been a decrease in per capita consumption and motor vehicle crashes, unfortunately, during this same time period there has been an INCREASE in other problems related to heavy and irresponsible drinking among college age youth. Most of these reported behaviors showed little change until AFTER the 21 year old law in 1987. For example from 1982 until 1987 about 46% of students reported "vomiting after drinking." This jumped to over 50% after the law change. Significant increase were also found for other variables: "cutting class after drinking" jumped from 9% to almost 12%; "missing class because of hangover" went from 26% to 28%; "getting lower grade because of drinking" rose from 5% to 7%; and "been in a fight after drinking" increased from 12% to 17%. All of these behaviors are indices of irresponsible drinking. This increase in abusive drinking behavior is due to "underground drinking" outside of adult supervision in student rooms and apartments were same age individuals congregate and because of lack of knowledge of responsible drinking behaviors.

Based upon the fact that our current prohibition laws are not working, the need for alternative approaches from the experience of other, and more ancient cultures, who do not have these problems need to be tried. Groups such as Italians, Greeks, Chinese and Jews, who have few drinking related problems, tend to share some common characteristics. Alcohol is neither seen as a poison or a magic potent, there is little or no social pressure to drink, irresponsible behavior is never tolerated, young people learn at home from their parents and from other adults how to handle alcohol in a responsible manner, there is societal consensus on what constitutes responsible drinking. Because the the 21 year old drinking age law is not working, and is counterproductive, it behooves us as a nation to change our current prohibition law and to teach responsible drinking techniques for those who chose to consume alcoholic beverages.


iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Con

k i think it shouldnt be lowered based on the fact that people are really dumb at this age... id rather someone smoke a joint and get high illegally then see someone 18 drinking that stuff kills weed doesnt ask anyone
Debate Round No. 1
orange

Pro

orange forfeited this round.
iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Con

iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
orange

Pro

orange forfeited this round.
iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Con

iTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOL forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by BluePine 5 years ago
BluePine
yeah lover the drinking age so you could see car accidents increasing.
Posted by Johnicle 5 years ago
Johnicle
The only way I'd take this is if I wanted to argue that it should not be lowered because it should be eliminated.
Posted by Hardcore.Pwnography 5 years ago
Hardcore.Pwnography
You said something about rebellion and how other people under 21 drink anyway. But lowering the drinking age won't solve that issue. They will still drink, just legally this time.
Posted by brian_eggleston 5 years ago
brian_eggleston
I was just about to post a very similar debate - I didn't because I wasn't sure if if I would be pro or con. I think I'm pro, and agree with orange, but I may take up the position of con if this debate is still here in the morning because I can see both sides of the argument..
Posted by Stephen_Hawkins 5 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
Use the first round for acceptance, newbie. Otherwise one can join such as myself from the grand ol' country of England where the drinking age is 18, and argue that it should not be lowered under 18. This would also be a valid argument as there was no parameters except the topic name. Be careful!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
orangeiTROLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Other than the fact that Pro should have used his arguments for the other rounds of the debate (for outlining the parameters of the debate), but nevetheless, Pro's argument stand. In short, a number of Pro's contentions--in comparison to Con's poor arguments--stand. (Note that Pro's arguments did not directly apply to the resolution, though...Lowering the drinking age equals giving youngsters a sense of responsibility and lowering "rebellious" behavior"?