Will You Forgive Me?
Debate Rounds (3)
Please do. I can't message you. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to argue. I'm new here. Is it too late? Also what does resolved mean?
You ask my client, Mr. Jaboticaba for forgivness. I am against such even being possible. Your honour, please understand that my client is a fruit, therefore not sentient, nor living thus rendering him inacapable of forgiving any person. Recently, my client's ghost writers have been debating against pro. In the debate, the rules were simply, and effectively pointed out. My client even wrote it in a huge font, in order to emphasize the importance.
Since I, con am against my client forgiving pro, I have already won this debate. I have proved that my client is a fruit, thus incapable of forgiving.
A jabucotiba is a fruit, not a jabocotiba. You even argued earlier. Therefore you are sentient.
But you also broke the rules too. You get away with it. I get punished. Constantly reminded? Only twice.
Also since you responded, I am asking you (the lawyer) to forgive me because you wrote the debate, since you're the only sentient one.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con's arguments were convincing.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.