The Instigator
H.j
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
WillRiley
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points

Will there ever be world peace

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
WillRiley
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/1/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 523 times Debate No: 67729
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

H.j

Con

No because if there countries stopping fight against each other then they will be terrorist making chaos in the world and there will always be disturbance in the world even on streets and riots and look at what football matches cause
WillRiley

Pro

Eventually, our sun will explode, ending all life on earth, and ending all conflict. This would technically be world peace.
Debate Round No. 1
H.j

Con

No it won't be world peace because there no world
WillRiley

Pro

The world will still exist, there will just be no life on it. There will be a period of time where there is an earth, but no humanity.
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by WillRiley 2 years ago
WillRiley
Thank you very much.
Posted by Zack95 2 years ago
Zack95
WOW. First of all, I want to aplaud pro. Mind blowing contradiction. When I clicked on this debate I was expecting the cliche argue meant, never thought I'd be in agreement with pro. But wow very intelligent arguement pro.
Posted by WillRiley 2 years ago
WillRiley
I understand your concern, however, you did not see the vote. The voter voted against me on every category, not for our arguments, but because of the way which I chose to do the debate. Obviously it was bad, being that it was removed by an admin.
Posted by Hakoda 2 years ago
Hakoda
No offense to you willriley but this isn't a presidential debate. This is a debate let everyone who is voting decide whether he has good or bad grammar. I know with your last debate I commented on it looks like I love to hate you, however that's not it at all. It's just there is one thing about debate I cannot stand and that's when things outside the debate determine who the winner is. Consider that in your next debate.
Posted by WillRiley 2 years ago
WillRiley
@Theunknown (Voter)
Point is, my devious tactics made me the obvious winner of the debate, and even if you don't approve, you can't justify voting against me for it. Also, you gave my opponent a point for grammar when he/she used absolutely no punctuation whatsoever. Please, reconsider your vote.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
H.jWillRileyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument made more sense.
Vote Placed by jzonda415 2 years ago
jzonda415
H.jWillRileyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had no punctuation at all. Also, his entire 1st round was just a large run-on sentence. Pro's grammar was far better, as he didn't make a mistake. Looking back on the debate, I can see why Con should receive arguments. Pro's objection didn't refute what Con said adequately. The response made sense, and it successfully dismantled Pro's case. Arguments to Con.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
H.jWillRileyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro came up with a clever response. I thought Con's counter-argument would have Pro in trouble, but Pro managed a sufficient re-rebuttal to win arguments. Con's grammar wasn't that bad despite not being perfect.