The Instigator
TOKGroup1
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
TigerroarskyZ
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Will women in combat hinder the strength of the military/unit?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TigerroarskyZ
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/17/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,222 times Debate No: 30347
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

TOKGroup1

Pro

I think that both men and women should be equal in the military.
TigerroarskyZ

Con

While i agree with your statement of equality in the military between men and women, it does not serve as a valid argument in this debte, as equality in social standing does not equal equality in strength. I'm not against women in combat or their being equally represented in the military, but the average strength of women and their natural needs (pms) will have a hinderance (very very very slight hinderance) on the military unit.
also, a quick point about the grammar of the debate topic: since the term "women" is plural, my opponent cannot make arguments based on a small, special portion of women or any single women, but focus on women as a whole.
Debate Round No. 1
TOKGroup1

Pro

TOKGroup1 forfeited this round.
TigerroarskyZ

Con

TigerroarskyZ forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
TOKGroup1

Pro

TOKGroup1 forfeited this round.
TigerroarskyZ

Con

THAT'S what I THOUGHT!!~
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by TigerroarskyZ 4 years ago
TigerroarskyZ
lolz
Posted by TolerantSpirit 4 years ago
TolerantSpirit
I think you meant to go con.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Raymond123 4 years ago
Raymond123
TOKGroup1TigerroarskyZTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: They won't
Vote Placed by xiaotian-Z 4 years ago
xiaotian-Z
TOKGroup1TigerroarskyZTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made an argument....