The Instigator
PokemonCatch
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
piefav
Con (against)
Losing
5 Points

Witch is better, Pokemon or digimon

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
PokemonCatch
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 578 times Debate No: 69011
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (5)
Votes (5)

 

PokemonCatch

Pro

Pokemon is definitely better than Digimon. I think this is because Pokemon have a language, and that is really cool, but Digimon speak human language, witch makes Pokemon unique. Another argument is that Pokemon do not die as often as Digimon do. That makes Digimon a really sad show to watch. My last argument is that Pokemon have WAY more attacks than Digimon does. Digimon usually have 1 or 2 moves, but Pokemon have lots of moves. So are you on my side that Pokemon are better than Digimon is :).
piefav

Con

Let me point out that you used incorrect grammar when saying "witch." You should have said "which." So, I'll go ahead and break your claim to pieces one by one.

1. Language
Pokemon don't have a language, they just say the name of themselves. Example, Pikachu says "Pika, pika pika" and "PiiikaaaaaaaaachhhUUUUUUUUU." Plus, "human language" isn't a language. If you're talking about the English language, than you should have said English.

So now that my 500 characters are almost up, vote con.
Debate Round No. 1
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Frikcha 2 years ago
Frikcha
Digimon and Pokemon: to me they're both just as good as each other. Pokemon games are better fun, but the Digimon world is much more interesting and the anime is much better than Pokemon.
Posted by piefav 2 years ago
piefav
Plus I only had 500 characters, what do you want?!?!
Posted by piefav 2 years ago
piefav
No offense to my opponent, but really voters? Me pointing out her grammar = Loss? Yet, when I use an argument that is one word shorter than the opposition, than I'm not expanding enough. I give up on this bloody website.....
Posted by Lulzy 2 years ago
Lulzy
Wait... so...only one round...and 500 characters allowed? ...What?
Posted by MyDinosaurHands 2 years ago
MyDinosaurHands
I'm not saying this to be mean, but rather to be helpful: the way you are using 'witch' is incorrect. Unless it's referring to the ladies with pointy hats, it's spelled which.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
PokemonCatchpiefavTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Spell err
Vote Placed by warren42 2 years ago
warren42
PokemonCatchpiefavTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con mostly just pointed out flaws with minimal constructive.
Vote Placed by Lulzy 2 years ago
Lulzy
PokemonCatchpiefavTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con spent an estimated third of his characters pointing out a spelling error when it's up to the judges to penalize, not Con. Con left other arguments out instead of going against them.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
PokemonCatchpiefavTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's gave more unreferenced reasons that Con, and Con only contested the language point of Pro's, so the other two of Pro's arguments are dropped, thereby making Pro win arguments. S&G to Con for Pro's terrible mistake in the resolution.
Vote Placed by Pokemonzr 2 years ago
Pokemonzr
PokemonCatchpiefavTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: I still agree that Pokemon are better, but I tried not to let that influence my decision. I gave the win to Pro because Con wasted most of their 500 characters by pointing out a grammatical error as well as weak refutations without really talking about Digimon. Pro supported his/her case better.