The Instigator
DInsight
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
benmellin
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

With money and technology anything is attainable.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
benmellin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2015 Category: Technology
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 490 times Debate No: 70615
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

DInsight

Pro

With money and technology anything is attainable.
benmellin

Con

If one has unlimited resources, one can not attain true love. Nuf said.
Debate Round No. 1
DInsight

Pro

DInsight forfeited this round.
benmellin

Con

Extend argument.
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Agentbean007 2 years ago
Agentbean007
i believe that with technology anything is attainable, because the few smart people with brains, get off the electronics and can attain anything, because they can work hard for a future. I think that technology is too involved with people's lives, and they don't know how to evolutionise the technology we have now, so we are stuck with this, but if we successfully get off the technology and revolutionise the world then who knows what we could accomplish.
Posted by KonstanBen 2 years ago
KonstanBen
Pro is already losing spelling and grammar due to an error in the title. There are two ways to form the sentence: with money and technology, anything is attainable or anything is attainable with money and technology.
Posted by KonstanBen 2 years ago
KonstanBen
Pro has the burden of defending against all possible arguments. Just a single thing that isn't attainable is a vote con.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
DInsightbenmellinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit. Pro makes a single-line assertion for his contribution to the debate. Con could have developed arguments more thoroughly.