The Instigator
ADDavid
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Arcanas
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Women are better at making sandwiches than Men

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Arcanas
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/25/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 775 times Debate No: 72345
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (11)
Votes (1)

 

ADDavid

Pro

Hello, I am here to debate on which Gender is better at making Sandwiches. Sandwhiches include anything that is in between two pieces of bread. There are rules.

1: No using Sexist or otherwise Vulgar language.
2: Religion does not affect the making of the sandwhiches.

Anyway, now introduce yourself and continue to debate.
Arcanas

Con

I accept. I won't post any arguments in this round so that we have the same number of rounds to argue. Thanks for Instigating this debate and good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
ADDavid

Pro

Alright, well, good luck to my opponent.

Women are better at infusing their sandwiches with emotions, using their menstrual super powers. Need I say more? Yes.
Women are way better at 'working dem hips' and getting that 'plump breast doh'. This means that they are adept at making sandwhiches 'sexualy arousing'. Must I also point out, that, they have softer bodies, so they run less of a risk to crush or mutilate a sandwich.
Arcanas

Con

"Women are better at infusing their sandwiches with emotions, using their menstrual super powers"

Pro gives no evidence of this. There is no reason to believe that women are able to infuse sandwiches with emotions.

"Women are way better at 'working dem hips' and getting that 'plump breast doh'. This means that they are adept at making sandwhiches 'sexualy arousing'. Must I also point out, that, they have softer bodies, so they run less of a risk to crush or mutilate a sandwich"

Again, Pro does not give any evidence of his claims.

Pro's arguments are bare assertions that should be ignored until he provides proof of the claims.

In addition to the lack of evidence of women being better than men at making sandwiches, evidence suggests that men are actually the superior sandwich makers. Many men have started successful businesses that are centered around sandwiches. In addition, guys have created some of the most successful sandwiches ever, including the mighty hamburger (created by Fletcher Davis). [1]

Clearly, pro has failed to prove his case and I have given evidence as to why men are talented sandwich makers.

Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!
Source:

[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 2
ADDavid

Pro

First of all, Con provides wikipedia as a source, which is highly unreliable. My personal experience is better!

Second, Con fails to acknowledge that some powers of the menstrual superpower scale (Official) Exist.

This is why Women can devour more chocolate than a ticklish raspberry.
Arcanas

Con

Would you please explain why this particular Wikipedia page is false?

I acknowledged it, and asked what the evidence for it's existence was. If there is none, I suggest that the audience does not believe him.

There was really no rebuttal to my arguments...

Thanks for reading and good luck next round!

Vote Con
Debate Round No. 3
ADDavid

Pro

ADDavid forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by bluesteel 1 year ago
bluesteel
====================================================================
>Reported vote: lannan13 // Moderator action: Removed<

6 points to Con (sources, conduct, arguments). {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture}

[*Reason for removal*] There was only a single round forfeit, which is sufficient to award conduct. This RFD does not adequately explain why it awarded sources and arguments.
====================================================================
Posted by bluesteel 1 year ago
bluesteel
====================================================================
>Reported vote: lannan13 // Moderator action: Removed<

6 points to Con (sources, conduct, arguments). {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture}

[*Reason for removal*] There was only a single round forfeit, which is sufficient to award conduct. This RFD does not adequately explain why it awarded sources and arguments.
====================================================================
Posted by ConceptEagle 1 year ago
ConceptEagle
This is so funny
Posted by Arcanas 1 year ago
Arcanas
How have I forfeited? I have two days left to post my argument.
Posted by ADDavid 1 year ago
ADDavid
It seems my opponent has forfeited.
Posted by Meagher117 1 year ago
Meagher117
BTW Arcanas, I removed my previous debate and made a new one of the same topic, feel free to debate.
Posted by PickUp_Artist 1 year ago
PickUp_Artist
My sandwiches are far more superior than you mortals...
Posted by lc225 1 year ago
lc225
I don't think it's meant as a joke. And men are much better at making sandwiches than women these days. at least in America. Women try so hard to not be the "traditional submissive women" that now they can't even make a proper sandwich. sad story. my sandwiches are awesome. Of course some women of course can make a good sandwich so this debate is pretty pointless because it varies from person to person. But all in all I'm gonna more men know how to make an awesome sandwich than women
Posted by Jcmiamiu7 1 year ago
Jcmiamiu7
I think it's hilarious
Posted by Stefy 1 year ago
Stefy
unless your trying to mock sexism
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ConceptEagle 1 year ago
ConceptEagle
ADDavidArcanasTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and had less evidence than con and did not use any source or detailed account of his personal experience.