Women are better at making sandwiches than Men
Debate Rounds (4)
1: No using Sexist or otherwise Vulgar language.
2: Religion does not affect the making of the sandwhiches.
Anyway, now introduce yourself and continue to debate.
Women are better at infusing their sandwiches with emotions, using their menstrual super powers. Need I say more? Yes.
Women are way better at 'working dem hips' and getting that 'plump breast doh'. This means that they are adept at making sandwhiches 'sexualy arousing'. Must I also point out, that, they have softer bodies, so they run less of a risk to crush or mutilate a sandwich.
Pro gives no evidence of this. There is no reason to believe that women are able to infuse sandwiches with emotions.
"Women are way better at 'working dem hips' and getting that 'plump breast doh'. This means that they are adept at making sandwhiches 'sexualy arousing'. Must I also point out, that, they have softer bodies, so they run less of a risk to crush or mutilate a sandwich"
Again, Pro does not give any evidence of his claims.
Pro's arguments are bare assertions that should be ignored until he provides proof of the claims.
In addition to the lack of evidence of women being better than men at making sandwiches, evidence suggests that men are actually the superior sandwich makers. Many men have started successful businesses that are centered around sandwiches. In addition, guys have created some of the most successful sandwiches ever, including the mighty hamburger (created by Fletcher Davis). 
Clearly, pro has failed to prove his case and I have given evidence as to why men are talented sandwich makers.
Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!
Second, Con fails to acknowledge that some powers of the menstrual superpower scale (Official) Exist.
This is why Women can devour more chocolate than a ticklish raspberry.
I acknowledged it, and asked what the evidence for it's existence was. If there is none, I suggest that the audience does not believe him.
There was really no rebuttal to my arguments...
Thanks for reading and good luck next round!
ADDavid forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ConceptEagle 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and had less evidence than con and did not use any source or detailed account of his personal experience.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.