The Instigator
hoer23
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
noprisu
Con (against)
Winning
31 Points

Women are too stupid to LIVE debate against men

Do you like this debate?NoYes-7
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
noprisu
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/16/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 815 times Debate No: 42485
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (5)

 

hoer23

Pro

Here's the proof:
noprisu

Con

toamatt26 already has this troll on his plate in two debates(1)(2), so I'll take this one for the collective DDO team.

I guess I'll show why he's a troll and not worth the proper argument of his biased and ad hominem based topic.

A. Troll behavior.
A troll is best defined by Urban Dictionary. While i cannot post a link, due to some browser restriction, and i apoliagize, the definition is:
"One who purposely and deliberately starts an argument in a manner which attack other users on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks with no substance..."

The entirety of the topic is ad hominem. He has provided no proof of his claim either.

Now you might be saying the following:

"Well what about his video? Is that not proof of his resolution?"

The video does not sufficentally quallify for proof. It's one instance of that happening, and not a well preformed or managed "debate" at that. The whole point of the video is biased.

There are right ways of using video in a debate(3), but it should not be your entire arguement unless that is the debate format. I believe that i mentioned this somewhere before, but i have not the time nor respect for this resolution to try to link it.

Bring it.

Sources:
1.http://www.debate.org...
2.http://www.debate.org...
3http://www.debate.org...
Debate Round No. 1
hoer23

Pro

This guy is obviously a scared faggot keyboard warrior and wetting his panties .. what a moron! LOLOL!

OWNED AGAIN DUMB FAGGOT LOLOL! http://i.imgur.com...
noprisu

Con

I'll now respond to his...err..."contentions".

"This guy is obviously a scared faggot keyboard warrior and wetting his panties .. what a moron! LOLOL!

OWNED AGAIN DUMB FAGGOT LOLOL! http://i.imgur.com...;

Again, ad hominem.

As i was writing this, something dawned on me. The arguments that he presents seems to be stock statements. Its almost like he isn't actually debating, but merely a bot is posting these arguments and responds to them in the programmed way. It makes sense, at least to me it does.

Lets test it out:

Opponent, what is (3^2)+(4^2)? Please post it to confirm you are a human before your debate.

I look forward to his response.
Debate Round No. 2
hoer23

Pro

hoer23 forfeited this round.
noprisu

Con

Such doge. Debate bad. No argument.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
Looks like TUF's doing a better job closing trolls' accounts than airmax did.
Posted by PeriodicPatriot 3 years ago
PeriodicPatriot
Why is it that every debate you have is against women in a rude and rubbish way? Just saying.
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
We all know who wins
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
This again this guy trolls and trolls for no reason and fights with videos
Posted by VukV2 3 years ago
VukV2
Of course we can notice who is the troll and who is smart. And here is the hint, the troll is the guy that swears, insults and can't win. Oh, and he is also uneducated and sexist.
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
This is going to be fun! I accepted an anti-troll debate too; maybe this will become a thing!

http://www.debate.org...
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Concade 3 years ago
Concade
hoer23noprisuTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: The Pro failed to prove that he was in fact a human and not a bot, hence I must award the round to the human Con.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
hoer23noprisuTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Dumb topic and even dumber arguments from pro
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
hoer23noprisuTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Hmm. This debate sucks. Horrible conduct.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
hoer23noprisuTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con as not only did Pro forfeit, but he used insults. Arguments to Con as he had some rather than just posting a link to a Youtube video and sources to Con as he had reliable sources relevant to his case.
Vote Placed by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
hoer23noprisuTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Reasons for voting decision: .