The Instigator
Con (against)
1 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Women don't need men

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/13/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 433 times Debate No: 89601
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




Women can actually reproduce without males. This process involves an artificial sperm to trick an egg into forming an embryo. All babies born this way will be female, so the world will not have or have need of males, since most of the wars, battles, or major conflicts that were ever started were because of men.
There is also another way; using bone marrow to create a female offspring.


Do you think any of these 'methods' are natural? These ways of reproduction go against the way of nature and the way that every species has done. You and your demonish methods go against God in every way. God made it that way, and you dirty (most likely black) scum think that you can defy His ways? I didn't even know black people could use computers, as their average IQ is a 3.2
The other hand is that your a woman. Why aren't you in the kitchen? Women these days should be beat by their husbands more often, that is one of the few things that I agree with the suicide bombing mooslims with. Otherwise you are a feminist and you should just make bread out of your vag yeast.
Arnold Benjaman
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by whiteflame 6 months ago
>Reported vote: randomman22// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Pro. Reasons for voting decision: Epic Reking lel

[*Reason for removal*] Not an RFD, lacks explanation for any of the point allocations.
Posted by atalaykutlay 6 months ago
I hope Arnold_Benjaman is just trolling.
Posted by Theunkown 6 months ago
What should be an easy win for Arnold Benjamin was thrown away because unnecessary religion and worse, racism, was brought along.
Maybe its trolling.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Leugen9001 6 months ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was supposed to argue that "women do need men", while Pro was supposed to argue that "women don't need men", but they both ended up arguing for the wrong cases. Thus, arguments is tied. Conduct goes to Con since Pro called Con a "dirty scum" and stated that the average IQ of black people was 3.2.