The Instigator
ESEJP
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tmar19652
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

Women shouldnt be able to be in front lines,?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
tmar19652
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/8/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 730 times Debate No: 31097
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

ESEJP

Con

Should women be able to go to combat? Why or why not?
tmar19652

Pro

I will argue that any women who meets the men's physical fitness standards should be allowed to fight on the front lines. You have the burden of proof to show they should not be able to.
Debate Round No. 1
ESEJP

Con

ESEJP forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Pro

Please extend my argument for equality in military service.
Debate Round No. 2
ESEJP

Con

ESEJP forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Pro

Please extend my argument.
Debate Round No. 3
ESEJP

Con

ESEJP forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Pro

I conclude that any woman who meets the male fitness requirements should be allowed to go into combat. Vote Pro!
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by ShortWinded 4 years ago
ShortWinded
Hell yeah they should be able to...
As long as they pass all that is necessary why not?
Most get washed out though. Yeah they can make GI jane pretty easily.
Special forces Id wager would 99% of the time take more than their bodies could muster...
Lack of testosterone makes it very very hard for muscle recovery on low amounts of sleep.
But hey if they wanna kick in doors and shoot "bad" people two to the chest and one to the head in a legal manner whats to stop them right?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 4 years ago
KingDebater
ESEJPtmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro because of Con's forfeit, spelling and grammar is a tie, arguments to Pro for his one short argument and there were no sources used so sources are a tie.