The Instigator
Tigerpowerpaws
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
2ninjacat
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

Women shouldn't be in super hero

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
2ninjacat
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/27/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 529 times Debate No: 74274
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (2)

 

Tigerpowerpaws

Pro

Round 1 accept and debbaste introductions.
Greatest whitish ex.
2ninjacat

Con

I accept. - do you mean introduction not instructions? Sorry if you didn't....

Women should be aspired to, we should admire their powers and we'll being rather than looks. Women are much as entertaining as men in adventure cartoons or thriller movies. Wonder Women is a great example of what to look up to. With incredible strength, amazing skill and sharp eye, we should also be inspired by women as much as men.
Debate Round No. 1
Tigerpowerpaws

Pro

I men to spell introduction. Lol, oops. Yolo.

Men are superior to women. Much stronger, thicker better and best. Better best, never let it rest, until your good is better and your better is your best. Men are the bestest of the best of the boss. They are not women. Women are pathetic. What are they good for?

Men area boss
Women are not boss

Men are the best, can't you tell. Whe do the fighting and the killing, he murders and the raping. That is all men. Men will rule the world one day. One day. Women aren't used for anything besides multiplying our society.

Can't you tell,l women are bad? Can't you. Omg dv obvious.

They are only in cartoons becauseese no one can get tho to their normal expectationsv. .

Overall, women are bad in com past to men.men are. Boss. Males are poss. Can't yout te,,. Omg. It is obvious. Vote for me if you agree. Momen are pathetic and a waist of life... Omg. Omg. Omfg. Omfg. Realise fac tic.
2ninjacat

Con

Men can treat women horrendously, being sexist and aiming to rape and or murder younger girls. It shows that men are more idiotic than women. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... also proves that men attack verbally and physically, women more often than women attacking women.

You say that women are 'a waist of life'. I prove this appallingly impossible. Women are amazing.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq4zYuuCrG4

In the past, women have been rejected and discriminated all because of their sex. Women should certainly be super heroes, and in the movies, children can now inspire to people they can actually be. Unlike Hulk or Spider-Man women can actually become or be similar to female super heroes.

Elsa (for example), all the little girls and some boys I know love Elsa. They dress up and sing like her, all forming a good role of that women can also save themselves or others. Men don't always have to be the saviour of everything. Men can share the glory if it is possible?

In addition, women can also be super heroes because it builds strong characteristics, hope and can inspire others; just as much as men. Men and women can both be inspirational, but only if they get the chance to.
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by lord_megatron 1 year ago
lord_megatron
lol pro
Posted by lord_megatron 1 year ago
lord_megatron
lol pro
Posted by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
@Diqiucun, lol.
Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 1 year ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
'Obvious troll is obvious.' - Captain Obvious
Posted by EAT_IT_SUKA 1 year ago
EAT_IT_SUKA
I reported PRO's round 2 argument.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
Tigerpowerpaws2ninjacatTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both sides maintained reasonable debate conduct. | S&G - Con. Pro had multiple spelling errors. "Round 1 accept and debbaste introductions" - "debate" is spelled "debbaste", and "Round 1 accept" is grammatically incorrect. "Greatest whitish ex" - this is incomprehensible gibberish. "Better best, never let it rest, until your good is better and your better is your best" - grammatically incoherent. "Better best" is not a correct combination of words, and "your good is better" presumes "good" as a noun in an incorrect sense. "Can't you tell,l women are bad? " - incorrect spacing after comma, "I" instead of "that". Pro makes many further errors. S&G to Con. | Arguments - Con. Pro made no major arguments, just making rhyming and incoherent sentences and raps. Pro's only argument was 'men are superior to women.' Con made strong unrefuted arguments. | Sources - Con. She used the only source. | 6 points to Con. | As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
Vote Placed by EAT_IT_SUKA 1 year ago
EAT_IT_SUKA
Tigerpowerpaws2ninjacatTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: PRO kept on lashing out at women, quite offensively, I might add (even though I'm male) , whereas CON kept a good composure throughout, thus, points are awarded to CON for better conduct. Spelling and Grammar: PRO had several spelling mistakes (see round 2) whereas CON did not, thus, points are awarded to CON for better spelling and grammar. Arguments: PRO's only argument was 'men are superior to women.' CON had strong, unrefuted arguments, thus, points are awarded to CON for more convincing arguments. Sources: CON gave a source in round 3, whereas PRO did not, thus, points are awarded to CON for more reliable sources. In case nobody reads the comments, I will say this again: I reported PRO's round 2 argument.