Word Debate
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
1dustpelt
| Started: | 2/19/2012 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 464 times | Debate No: | 21200 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)
|
Okay, I have seen many of these and thought this might be interesting.
Instructions: Pick any word and state the definition. Rules: Only one word. If you don't put a definition, you lose. My word is: Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis Definition: pneu�mo�no�ul�tra�mi�cro�scop�ic�sil�i�co�vol�ca�no�co�ni�o�sis [noo-muh-noh-uhl-truh-mahy-kruh-skop-ik-sil-i-koh-vol-key-noh-koh-nee-oh-sis, nyoo-] Show IPA noun an obscure term ostensibly referring to a lung disease caused by silica dust, sometimes cited as one of the longest words in the English language. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sources: http://dictionary.reference.com...
I accept the rules. My word is: Zenzizenzizenzic Definition: Zenzizenzizenzic is an obsolete form of mathematical notation representing the eighth power of a number (that is, the zenzizenzizenzic of a number x is the power x8), dating from a time when powers were written out in words rather than as superscript numbers. |
![]() |
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 1 year ago
| 1dustpelt | SarcasticIndeed | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Not a debate.
Vote Placed by Zealous1 1 year ago
| 1dustpelt | SarcasticIndeed | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 2 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con used the only source. Pro wins though because I'm tired of the "haha my word is longer" wins. I mean really, how cheap is that? Pro had a cool word that was interesting to learn.
Vote Placed by FIGHTTHEPOWER29 1 year ago
| 1dustpelt | SarcasticIndeed | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: The word was outrageously unrealistic but had a source . The Pro had no sources to support his word and his word is also unrealistic.. Win by Con for providing a source..













http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://www.allwords.com...