The Instigator
The-Holy-Macrel
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Jonbonbon
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Worst movie ever.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Jonbonbon
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/29/2014 Category: TV
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 793 times Debate No: 62411
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

The debatehere is this first round as acceptance. Then we go back and fourth on the most absolutely terrible movies on every aspect from round two to four then we conclude on the fifth
Jonbonbon

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

I will start off with Superman IV: The Quest For For Peace

I feel bad for choosing this becauseof christopher reeve but 12% on rotton tomatoes is a sure sign of how bad it is.
The audience score? 16%.
But now it is time to analize it ourselves
-cheap special effects.
-actors don't look interested in the plot.
-and the acting is boring.
It earned two golden razzies.
I don't think you can find a much morse movie.
Jonbonbon

Con

I found a worse movie.

With a total of 0% on the Tomatometer [1], an amazingly insightful view from the nostalgia critic [2], and just overall "no" [3] I would like to submit that the Garbage Pail Kids was the worst movie ever made.

The story line was terrible.
The acting was sub par to being sub par.
The relationship between like a ten year old kid and some teenage high school girl was no.
But of course, the worst sin of all: they freaking sold the movie and people spent money on it. That's pure evil. Villainy at its finest.

Sources:
[1] http://www.rottentomatoes.com...
[2] http://blip.tv...
[3] Jonbonbon's Unabridged Encyclopedia of Movies
Debate Round No. 2
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

First in this third round i would like to point out the audience score was 28%.
That is a pretty bad score but
The starving games has a audience score of 23% with 0 on the tomatometer

http://www.rottentomatoes.com... For rotten tomatoes
http://variety.com... for a review
Jonbonbon

Con

Jonbonbon forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

The-Holy-Macrel forfeited this round.
Jonbonbon

Con

Well, I guess we're even on conduct.

But anyway, my opponent is just kind of abandoning the superman deal.

Just watching the review makes me physically ill when it comes to the Garbage Pail Kids (by the way, I apologize for the language, but the movie deserves it).

Anyway, I mean, my opponent hasn't even responded. I have provided evidence of a movie that sucks way more than the first one he posted. All he posted is a rotten tomatoes review. Keep in mind that audience reviews don't mean a ton, because your average audience member probably doesn't think as critically they should for a review.

So may I direct your attention to the top right.



Thank you.
Debate Round No. 4
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

Conclusion:The survival games is the worst movie ever.

sidenote:i gave the link to the review because i didn't feel like copying/typeing why it stank. Plz read the review for my description and why it was a terrible movie.
Jonbonbon

Con

My opponent hasn't actually made an argument.

Just posting evidence doesn't qualify as making an argument. If my opponent is too lazy to write out why his choice beats my choice (keep in mind he was convinced to change his original choice and I wasn't), then my opponent doesn't just get to post someone else's argument and say that's going to be his argument for the debate. (That's actually plagiarism even thought he's citing a source because he's not actually coming up with his own argument).

I have been unrefuted. Thank you for reading.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
Or maybe one of these will go for the "classic bad film"...?
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
or even ZZyzx, the lowest earning movie ever.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
I can imagine pro choosing The Worst Movie Ever!
It's truly the worst.
http://en.wikipedia.org...!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
The-Holy-MacrelJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro dropped the ball on this one. Con presented a movie that was obviously much worse than all three of the movies Pro shared. Pro never really responded to why his movies should be considered worse than the one shared by Con. For this reason, I award the win to Con.
Vote Placed by ShadowKingStudios 2 years ago
ShadowKingStudios
The-Holy-MacrelJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: If only one FF-ed then the other would win. Double FF negates an automatic win. As a Superman fan Pro started off strong with that horrible #4 installment (the only S-man movie I won't watch next to #3). However, he fizzled & completely & shamefully nose-dived into stupidity. But Con presented a movie that in name alone sounds terrible. Backed by powerful sources & simple readable presentation, Con was not only more convincing but presented a worse movie than Quest for Peace. S&G to Con for no errors (that I could detect).
Vote Placed by whiteflame 2 years ago
whiteflame
The-Holy-MacrelJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty straightforward. Pro never made an argument, allowing his links to do the arguing for him. Con didn't have much of an argument, but at least he had some. That's not to mention that Pro jumped ship on his first choice. Con easily takes the debate.